40% of the time Victims are Wrongly Convicted

This my scientific estimate as a Pathologist. When, I do a Postmortem Examination, I do a thorough historical research before using the surgical blade to dissect. 

The surgical blade has to go through the skin with some diversions considering the circumstances one is currently dealing with.

Presumptions are 

Natural Cause 

Accident Cause

Blue Murder

But now I put another category. 

Unknown is 40% is in that category.

Other 60% can be accommodated within the 3 causes.

I think Forensic Pathologists also have the same dilemma but they are expected to make a sound judgement less wrong one is convicted. 

Forensic Pathologist has to present the probable causes and he is not expected to make any judgement. 

It is the judge who makes the final judgement but he or she can have a jury to deliberate. 

I personally have no confidence on the jury since some professionals, lawyers and doctors are deliberately excluded. 

People gone bankrupt are included in the exclusions. 

The guys who sits there are considered commoners and able to make a fair judgement. 

All these factors make me to stick to 40% WRONG JUDGEMENT.

Fallosies can creep in at many levels.

1. At the Initial evidence lebel where the one who gives the evidence has already made his or her own opinion, at least subconsciously. 

In other words they are bised.

2. Police officers who record the evidence are not expected to twists in recording the evidence but invariably they make subconscious attempt to fit into the 3 levels. 

My 4th level is not in their mind.

3. Prosecutor or the lawyers presenting the case (for or agaist the victim) also twist the evidence.

4. Fourthly and inevitably the judges have to make a decision based on above fallible stages. 

I am not happy with 3 judges but prefer the Buddhist convection on Sangha decision by 5. 

Seven does not make any headway and 10 is wasting resources.

But 20 is my biological indicator where if one sees 20 biological items linked, it is designated arbitrarily by me as a biological hotspot. In that sence our rooftop garden was a Biological Hotspot at least for Water Plants since I collected them over 15 years and cared for them at least on weekly basis if not daily.

I wanted to make a biological hotspot for orchids (Orchid House) but could not finish the task since I decided to move away from CEYLON on reasons which I do not want to mention here except that guys like Nirmal Ranjith is antithesis to me.

He is distorting our ribust political history.

I consider him a pest in current circumstances. He has not read the originals in German, French or English.

That is why Buddhist monks are expected to know at least 6 languages. Thotagamuva Sri Rahula knew six Indian languages (polyglot).

It is said his cadaver did not rot and Portuguese invaders smuggled it to Goa and claimed it as a Christian saint.

His (Sri Rahula) contribution to Dhamma is almost none but his contribution to Sinhala literature was enormous. 

Hence, I have not followed his life as an academic exercise.

I am a scientific guy.

Nirmal Ranjitj is nowhere when comparee to late Kumar David. 

I guess he has never read des captial by Karl Marx either in German or in English. 

He has gathered his knowledge from Sinhala translations which carry gross errors. In that sense his observation are not valid politically like inciting ordinary people to break peace in this country for no valid reasons except for a party with arcane ideas not valid under current global conditions.