Multiverse
or Universe?
To
me the word Universe is very limited in dimension.
Let
me explain human limitations.
First
we are limited by the speed of light.
Second
we only see a past event and we will never be able to see the present
form of the universe.
Our
visual range is limited to about 256 colours out of millions of
colours a computer can decipher.
Within
that 256 only about 16 can be (based on binary arithmetic on which
computer code is developed) clearly identified by our brain.
We
make up with this visual deficiency by means of neural networks that
have an imprint of memory of the colour so registered by repeated
visual contact.
There
is a delay of a few milliseconds for the neural message to reach the
cortical centers and arouse the underlying networks of neural systems
and an illusion of the colour range is imagined by the brain.
This
imagination make us to be orientated in space and time.
Otherwise
the original visual signal is upside down, right on left and even the
two images that are produced on the eyes are crisscrossed.
Our
medical teachers never told us that the vision is an illusion of some
sort and never explained the real physiology behind true vision.
So,
thinking of quantum level and making computers is far beyond human
imagination.
Now
coming to the universe and space.
The
following account is outrageous.
I
never believed the “Big Bang” and it is a rudimentary
theory of the cosmos.
It
never explained other dimensions beyond “Three D World”.
I
will come to that later.
First
of my hypothesis is that there is nothing called space or void.
In
the universe there cannot be any void.
If
there is a void anywhere in the universe, it would soon be filled
with some form of energy entity not visible (our limitation) to our
eyes.
It
is so subtle that it even escapes our imagination.
Now
a good entry point to dark matter.
The
fact of the matter is darkness makes the visual identification of
dark entities impossible.
We
need a visual clue for hypothesis.
Even
Edwin Hubble saw this fallacy.
Without
giving a name to this energy he said the “Universe is
Expanding”.
He
had a scientific tool, “The Red Shift”.
Moving
objects always bluff us into confusion and our brain makes us to
believe that we are stationary and so “make the other moving
objects as moving objects”.
Now
the crunch point.
Matter
world is only 5%.
Dark
matter and Dark energy are 95%.
So
we postulate our physics from 5% of observations and those laws
cannot be extrapolated to even our Universe let alone Multiverse.
We
need new physics to explain the expanding universe.
That
is not an easy task and it is not the intention of this piece.
I
have another problem in my mind.
Why
our galaxy is flat and spiral?
Why
is its shape not spherical like the objects in the matter world?
Objects
take their shapes so that the gravitational force compresses the
matter, hindering any “space” within.
There
may be imaginary space but that space is also occupied by subtle
energy form.
The gravitation force can never be uniform.
It
got to be related to the mass and should wane off at a particular
distance.
Otherwise
the bigger object the sun will gobble our earth in no time and make
it part of its mass of burning inferno.
In
other words matter cannot remain stable.
It
got to turn into energy and this may have some relationship to the
movement of objects in energy space.
Still
it does not explain the flatness and the spiral behaviour of the
galaxies.
This
is where I use the hypothesis that in the center of the spiral galaxy
the matter turns into dark matter (if one looks at the pictures of
Hubble Telescope, there is visible dark areas), hence expanding it
from within.
Similarly
at the periphery of the galaxy dark matter is changing into matter
causing it to contract and offset the expanding force at the center.
This
change is very subtle and barely perceptible due to the distance
(from our eyes) from the center to the periphery.
That
may explain the spiral behaviour but not the flatness.
I
have to use string theory of mathematics and more dimensions (than 3
D) to explain the flatness.
Just
like the theory of matter becoming dark mater and the vice versa, I
have the “Zip Theory” of zipping and unzipping of the dimensions.
Each
dimension is independent and there are “Worm Holes” separating
one from another.
One
cannot be in two dimensions one and the same time.
Remember the
“Cat Theory” in the box that both dead and alive.
The
zipping and unzipping according to the string theory probably happen
at the“Worm Holes” and physics of it is difficult to comprehend
in 3D mathematics.
These
worm holes (vast in number) are on either side of the galaxies
(should not be confused with “Dark Holes” of dark matter) and
probably flatten the space fabric of the galaxies while at the same
time stabilizing their gravitation forces.
In
other words one galaxy does not eat up another galaxy by exerting
superior force.
The
balancing act of the forces may allow more dimensions to exist beyond
our universe and the possibility of multiverse is theoretically
feasible.
Each
dimension has its own domain within the same space (space is a
misnomer but a force itself) of existence but without interfering
with each other.
The
frequency of each existence or domain is independent in a vast
spectrum of frequencies or domains giving rise to any possible
variations of string theory of mathematics.
It
makes numerous galaxies, dimensions and even multiverse possible.
The
“Big Bang” does not explain all the vagaries possible.
It
adds a time dimension (like God theory) of unidirectional expression
and limits the probabilities to one universe.
That
is a false premise by its own limitations.
Just
like I do not propose void or space, I do not propose a beginning or
end of “Universe of Things”.
The
word universe limits the expression to ultimate reality.
There
is nothing called ultimate reality but the perception of many (in
plural) dimensions or realities.
Invisible
“Black holes” are possible in this scenario expressed above. They
gobble matter into non visible holes.
Their
presence becomes visible only when they spew out galaxies from one
end of its own dimension within our visible range.
Beyond
our visible range we can only postulate other dimensions.
All
these variations, vagaries, inconsistencies and intricacies make us
failing to grasp the bigger picture.
The
unifying theory has eluded us.
Are
the dark forces and the gravity the only forces of nature?
Are
there more forces eluding our comprehension?
