Saturday, August 24, 2019

To Hell or Heaven

To Hell or Heaven


It is said
That when
A Sri-Lankan
Plans to go abroad
He becomes secretive
And almost paranoid
Does not tell anybody
Of his intentions
Lest somebody pulls a string
Under the carpet
To stop
His endeavour
But
Once he is abroad
And found
A filthy dwelling
For habitation
He is in all but praise
Of the new found
Hell sans freedom
Wants all his fellow beings
Left behind
To come, join him
In misery
And share his chores and concerns
I am told
This is so
In the Middle East
Or else as
A refuge
In the West
But,
What is significant?
And the most compelling fact
Is that
When one goes to hell
He makes sure
All his fellow beings
Are pulled out there from here
Like a magnetic attraction
To share the misery
But,
By chance
If he found
A decent and healthy place
As a habitat
He writes home
In shame and disregard
Of the place adopted
Lest he has
To share
The wealth and happiness
Of the New Found Land
This is not
In anyway
A warning for anybody
Who wishes to go out
And explore
The Sri-Lankan
Who wish for divine intervention?
All the time,
End up in hell instead
But,
When one goes to heaven
They go there all alone
Simply because
Increasing the numbers there
Would be antagonistic
To the Zero Growth Principle
Propounded by me
Here and now
The propensity
Adopted by,
The Sri-Lankans
Who are already there
Established in position and fame
Is truly different in magnitude
But,
Buddhist anthology and tradition,
Is the “Kalyana Mitta”,
The true friend who helps
The upward bound
Of beings
To high heaven
Come what it may
Now and always
Sans boundaries,
Of colour, caste, creed or class
Sadly.
It is known for its absence
In the modern world
Of material gain
Is it asking too much?
To go for zero growth
In activity, mobility and expansion
To save our mother nature
Using the eye of wisdom
To see and vision,
The guiding principle
Is “Small is beautiful”
“Less is more”
In Nature
To know this
The man doesn’t
Need a brain as big as
The nature has endowed
Upon him
To apply
The simple principle
Of cohabitation with
Mother nature
The mother of all

Friday, August 23, 2019

Passing the Baton and the beating the Police Baton Polla


Passing the Baton and the beating the Police Baton Polla

This piece is bit spicy.

We have moved from the community spirits of passing the baton (responsibility) to beating the baton (iron fist of the police) mentality.

It is all due to family brandism and now the baton is passed exclusively within a family.

This in addition has mutated to passing the buck dualism.

From DS it passed to Dudley.
Thanks to vociferous left Dudley left politics and lived up to old age as a common man.

JR was in the background and was incubating hate to the entire nation.

Real destruction started with SWRD who introduced racism and religion to politics and sadly Sirima took the baton after his demise and even the army was brought into the forefront to destroy JVP.
People were killed in the bread queues with socialist not having a recovery program to fill the empty coffers.

Manioc was the staple food of the poor.

Nobody helped except perhaps China with rice (started from Sir John Kotalawala)

Sir John left to UK saying it was far better to hunt foxes than doing politics in Ceylon.

It was then lovingly called Ceylon.
Only one who did not have a formal family (he may have fathered out of wedlock).

JVP was an aberration in our politics (one phrase is enough to describe it in entirety).

Ranasingha (called running (duvana) president by the LTTE) Premada having used army to throttle JVP extended his hands to LTTE and programed his own death.

JRJ was in between and introduced a bizarre constitution of his family.

His son was a STF man and is no more.

Anura to Chandrika was family brandism with a arm twist.
Chandrika twisted the arm of his brother and continued to cajole with the defunct left.

That is the period of anarchy in this country.

Unfortunately I was abroad and returned to see the rejuvenation of this country.

I was proved absolutely wrong.

The last stage of the family brandism is now in display.

We thought we reversed the trend in 2015.

MS who took the baton turned backwards on the masses and went backward and handed over the baton to the last man in the relay team.
He has a family but he could not brand it quick enough.

What an upshot and RW was passing the buck of the central bank and still have to form a family of his convicts.

Then the son of Premadasa is going to take the family baton in style and I bet he would fail (by ruining the party his father started by eliminating Gaminie and Athulkathmudali and many more).

While all these happening another family is benefiting while doing sweet nothing (except stirring racism) in the process but wanting to go back to beating the Police Baton Polla mentality.

We use the baton as a polla to hit or slavery and not as a proverbial relay of responsibility.

Reality

This is a lengthy answer for one of my friends.


Reality

Too many questions in one go.

To begin with there is no unifying theory of everything.

Steven Hawking tried all his life and he failed.

Newton's gravitational theory is wrong.

Dismiss it outright.
There is curving of gravitational force (it is not straight).

If we formulate Multi-Universe (not single Universe) the gravitational force will be different in each one.

Einstein was close enough but he was restraint by the Church.


He has to invent the Big Bang (to go along with God Creation)


He formulated the Dark Energy to establish a constant but did not elaborate on it.


Space and time was described as a fabric (by Steven Hawking (Who? I may be wrong) not as curvature.


Now the bombshell.


Matter is only 5%.

Dark matter and energy is 95% (just similar to genetic cord less than 5% is read and others dormant-why?).

Hubble is the first one to describe redshift and that the Universe is expanding..

He thought it was at a constant rate but the current understanding is it is accelerating fast and widely.

My contention is that disorder is PRIME and order is RARE (except in Biological systems).

It is on that PRESUMPTION (not a theory) I expand the discussion.

At a particular point of rapid expansion matter will disappear and gravity cannot hold onto matter.

Then there are black holes with enormous gravity (let us say big eater) that will eat up every possible matter it encounters.

That is the other end of the spectrum (it is not linear by the way) contracting universe.

I believe nether expansion theory nor contraction theory explains the current state of affairs.

We need to study other galaxies (on top of our space fabric and below) and formulate new mathematics and expand on Einstein's efforts.



Space and time linear model won't help.


That is why Steven Hawking suggested Imaginary Time.


Now another bombshell of mine in summary.


There is nothing called SPACE, it is a self grandiose model to visualize Reality


Space is immediately occupied by some form of energy.


They had to formulate nuclear forces for atomic theory.


Dark energy for universe was Einstein's only entry without explanations.


Dark Energy and Dark matter are REAL but we have not yet visualized it to understand their workings.


We are visual model thinkers and limited by three dimensional view of reality.


We cannot understand fourth or fifth dimensions.

Mathematics describes at least 13 dimensions.


Reality is not constrained by dimensions and we will never understand (not even by meditation practice) Reality.


So accept our inborn LIMITATION of thinking capacity.

So I do not bother and pose a question and have a hearty laugh.

Laughter (my domain is satire) is the best medicine of all.
Just laugh at our ignorance and enjoy the little present or Now Now we have.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

Continue the Course Correction, Already Started, Without Fear


Continue the Course Correction, Already Started, Without Fear

Can we do that?

Yes we can.

Just take examples from the animal kingdom.
Ants and spiders are very clever.
They have a strategy and weapons.
They never use the weapon of fear first.
Approach of the animal kingdom is very simple.
When they are confronted with they do not attack first.
They pause and assess the pros and cons quickly.
They take a slight cause correction, knowing very well that may be wrong.
Then advance slowly until the angle of diversion is large enough.
When they are safely away they accelerate at rapid space until the energy of fear that initiated is exhausted.
Then they take a pause and correct the course diversion (going for food or prey) and advance.
Humans have lost this trait by wrong examples, particularly in Ceylon.
We have advanced just enough to avoid counterattack possible.
What we need is slight course correction and advance at easy pace to the desired goal.
Fear has lost its value, since it was used inappropriately and in large quantities in the past.
But there is still a long way to go especially in the legal sphere.
Politically there is no retrogression.
It is counterproductive but progress is historically and metaphorically slow.
Perseverance is the correct strategy.

Order of Disciplines


Order of Disciplines

Philosophy is the First Order Discipline.
Its asks the appropriate question at the appropriate time.
If the wrong question is asked (Does the God really exist or is he the creator?- only he no she) one is beheaded 2400 years ago.

If you DO NOT ask this question NOW you are considered as a fanatic.

Atheists have not resorted to beheading strategy since they are still persecuted by the Church.

The second order discipline is Science.
Science is still evolving.
It has not grasped even the 5% of the total.

If one considers matter as 5% and Dark matter as the rest 95%.

The third order discipline is religion and it is redundant.

Why?

It cannot provide answers to neither the questions raised by philosophers nor science.

That is the bottom line and its threat to the survival of the human species is real.

Imagine a high priest having the nuclear bomb arsenal for his disposal.

He would detonate it for easy passage to heaven.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

In defense of Darwin

In defense of Darwin
There are number of salient points that were not available to Darwin that cannot be ignored.

They did not come by chance.

My premise is that evolution brought order to the world (universe) without them


There was economy in participation.

Assimilation of two carbon units, twenty amino acids coded by a few purines and pyrimidines, about 20,000 variants of structural proteins with only levo-rotation (no dextro-rotatoion of sugar molecules) are convincing evidence that it started at one point in modern evolution but continued albeit slowly.
 
But nitty gritty of evolution and diversion of species were determined not by nucleus but by mitochondrial evolution.

Mitochondria were very resistant to mutation and they occur once in every 3 to 5 million year intervals.

When that happened drastic changes happened to the primates (erect posture, language acquisition and larger brain) in evolution.

How it happened in an ovum is a mystery by all accounts and we do not have mitochondrial data to evaluate.

For example we have giant mitochondria in salivary glands and in yeasts.

Yeast mitochondria can hijack nuclear DNA and that is one way of mitochondrial evolution.
 

Mitochondria evolved by endosymbiosis.  

Mitochondria originated by a endosymbiotic event when a bacterium was captured by a eukaryotic cell. 
The organelles have far fewer genes than an independent bacterium, and have lost many of the gene functions that are necessary for independent life (such as metabolic pathways).

Why only 20 amino acids not 24 or 40 amino acids?

There is a natural selection strategy of amino acids, what Darwin postulated, without even having a microscope or genetic code.

A really a great thinker.

"The research helps us understand how positively charged peptides could have formed on the pre-biotic earth," says Moran Frenkel-Pinter, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow at Georgia Tech and first author of the paper. Peptides are made when two or more amino acid building blocks link up, leading to the proteins that make up every organism.
Leman, Frenkel-Pinter and many other scientists in this field find it strange that every living thing on our planet forms its proteins from the exact same set of 20 amino acids.

Why that specific set?
Scientists know there are many more amino acids out there.

In fact, meteorites with up to 80 amino acids have landed on Earth.

"In the prebiotic Earth, there would have been a much larger set of amino acids," says Leman, who also is scientific collaborator at the Center for Chemical Evolution. 
"Is there something special about these 20 amino acids, or did these just get frozen at a moment in time by evolution?"

The new study suggests that life's dependence on these 20 amino acids is no accident. The researchers show that the kinds of amino acids used in proteins are more likely to link up together because they react together more efficiently and have few inefficient side reactions.


In defense of Darwin

There is a sinister attempt in the past and in the present to discredit Darwin, mathematically.

Simply because he challenged the Church’s single model of creation which is outdated by million (billion of biological evolution) years of human evolution.

Church’s evolution is little over 2400 years and is statistically insignificant in years.

Let me say who I am first.

A pathologist and a critical analyst in data, particularly in Linux.

Luckily I went into research well past my 55 and my supervisor was 10 years younger and he was interfering with my work (actually my writing skills).

I still do not know why.

I called a meeting and unless he stops interfering, I am going to ditch my formal research into the dustbin and got up and walked towards the bin.

Finally I ditched him and made alternative arrangements.

My research was on morphology of placenta, there was nobody in Ceylon who had done any work on placenta.
That is why I chose it, for application of formal (it became extensive) research tools.

Statistics in particular.

I mastered statistical tools (borrowed from a Japanese guy) while doing the research.

Luckily my real teacher, the late professor of Pathology Victor Tennakoon had warned me of the outcome of any investigation.

He said without using (long experience over 40 years) any statistics you would discover only 20% of the new and we already know 40% and the rest 40% will never be known.

My gut feeling was that we can hit 90% based on the premise of 50% genetic and 50 environment influence.

Glad to say, I had to revise my premise having studied a book “statistics in biology” which is totally different from just the numerical statistics.

The writer of the book had studied things similar to what Darwin had observed in his long voyage of 5 years in the Beagle.

That book’s interpretation was similar to my professor.

Roughly 30% genetic, 30% environment and 30% unknown (please do not apply god to this portion, it is generally 100% God intervention), 10% as design error.

In my study figures were 28% (environment or diet), 32% genetics and 40% unknown (what my professor told me empirically, 25 years before I ventured into my research work).

I simply disproved God’s 100% perfection as far as human birth is concerned.

When Darwin recorded his data Genetics was not known or in existence.

Mendel’s plant (he was a priest) observation (pea) was published in early 1900.

Darwin delayed his book simply because Church was on his back.

This may be true for Mendel, too.

The Church’s orthodoxy was at stake by these two men of science.

I say Darwin was a Modern Thinker.

Just see what happened to Bertrand Russel.
He was persecuted by the Church and the British.
He was declared dead by the Church while hiding (suffered what we used to call double pneumonia) in China in 1920.
He survived due to nursing care of a good British Nurse.
The Church was flabbergasted.

Monday, August 19, 2019

Superman or Brahman

"Who makes his living among men, by agriculture, you should know is called a farmer,
Vasettha; He is not a Brahman.

Who makes his living among men by varied crafts, you should know is called a craftsman,
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.

Who makes his living among men by merchandise, you should know is called a merchant,
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin. 



Who makes his living among men by serving others, you should know is called a servant,
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.

Who makes his living among men by stealing, you should know is called a robber, 

Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.
 

Who makes his living among men by archery, you should know is called a soldier, 
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.
 

Who makes his living among men by priestly craft, you should know is called a chaplain, 
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.
 

Whoever governs among men the town and realm, you should know is called a ruler, 
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.

"I call him not a brahmin because of his origin and lineage. If impediments still lurk in him,
 

He is just one who says 'Sir.'Who is unimpeded and clings no more: 
He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has cut off all fetters and is no more by anguish shaken,
Who has overcome all ties, detached: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has cut each strap and thong, the reins and bridle-band as well,
Whose shaft is lifted, the awakened one: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who endures without a trace of hate abuse, violence, and bondage too,
With strength of patience well arrayed: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who does not flare up with anger, dutiful, virtuous, and humble,
Subdued, bearing his final body: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who, like the rain on lotus leaves, or mustard seed on the point of an awl,
Clings not at all to sensual pleasures: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who knows right here within himself the destruction of all suffering,
With burden lowered, and detached: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who with deep understanding, wise, can tell the path from the not-path and has attained the goal supreme: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Aloof alike from householders and those gone into homelessness, who wanders without home or wish: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has laid aside the rod against all beings frail or bold, aho does not kill or have them killed: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who is unopposed among opponents, peaceful among those given to violence, who does not cling among those who cling: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has dropped all lust and hate, dropped conceit and contempt, like mustard seed on the point of an awl: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who utters speech free from harshness, full of meaning, ever truthful, which does not damage anyone: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who in the world will never take what is not given, long or short, small or big or fair or foul: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has no more inner yearnings regarding this world and the next, who lives unyearning and detached: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has no more indulgences no more perplexity since he knows, through having reached the Deathless Sphere: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who, by transcending all ties here about both merit and evil deeds, is sorrowless, stainless, and pure: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who, pure as the spotless moon, is clear and limpid,
and in whom delight and being have been destroyed: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has passed beyond the swamp, the mire, samsara, all delusion, who has crossed to the further shore and meditates within the jhanas,
Is unperturbed and unperplexed, attained Nibbana through no clinging:
He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has abandoned sensual pleasures and wanders here in homelessness, with sense desires and being destroyed: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has abandoned craving too, and wanders here in homelessness, with craving and being both destroyed: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who leaves behind all human bonds and has cast off the bonds of heaven,detached from all bonds everywhere: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who leaves behind delight and discontent, who is cool and without attachment, the hero who has transcended the whole world: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who knows how beings pass away to reappear in many a mode, unclutching he, sublime, awake: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Whose destination is unknown to gods, to spirits, and to men, an arahant with taints destroyed: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has no impediments at all, before, behind, or in the middle, who is unimpeded and clings no more: He is the one I call a brahmin. 


The herd's leader, perfected hero, the great seer whose victory is won, unperturbed, cleansed, awakened: 
He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who knows his manifold past lives and sees the heavens and states of woe, who has reached the destruction of birth: 

He is the one I call a brahmin.
 

For name and clan are assigned as mere designations in the worldoriginating in conventions and they are assigned here and there.

For those who do not know this fact, wrong views have long underlain their hearts;
Not knowing, they declare to us: 

One is a brahmin by birth.'

One is not a brahmin by birth, nor by birth a non-brahmin, by action is one a brahmin and by action is one a non-brahmin.

For men are farmers by their acts, and by their acts are craftsmen too;
And men are merchants by their acts, And by their acts are servants too.
And men are robbers by their acts, And by their acts are soldiers too;
And men are chaplains by their acts, And by their acts are rulers too.
 

So that is how the truly wise, see action as it really is, seers of dependent origination, and skilled in action and its results.

Action makes the world go round, action makes this generation turn.
Living beings are bound by action, like the chariot wheel by the pin.

Asceticism, the holy life, self-control and inner training by this one becomes a brahmin, in this supreme brahminhood lies.

One possessing the triple knowledge. peaceful, with being all destroyed, know him thus, O Vasettha, As Brahma and Sakka for those who understand."

Mankind

Mankind

With humans no differences of birth makes a distinctive mark in them.

Nor in the hairs nor in the head, nor in the ears nor in the eyes, nor in the mouth nor in the nose Nor in the lips nor in the brows, nor in the shoulders or the neck Nor in the belly or the back, nor in the buttocks or the breast Nor in the anus or genitals, nor in the hands nor in the feet, nor in the fingers or the nails, nor in the knees nor in the thighs, nor in their color or in voice.

Here birth makes no distinctive mark, as with the other kinds of birth.
In human bodies in themselves. 
Nothing distinctive can be found.
Distinction among human beings, is purely verbal designation.

Vasettha Sutta: To Vasettha

​ Vasettha Sutta: To Vasettha

MN 98 Vasettha Sutta: To Vasettha 

Thus have I heard.

On one occasion the Blessed One was living at Icchanangala, in the wood near Icchanangala. Now on that occasion a number of well-known, well-to-do brahmins were staying at Icchanangala, that is, the brahmin Canki, the brahmin Tarukkha, the brahmin Pokkharasati, the brahmin Janussoni, the brahmin Todeyya, and other wellknown, well-to-do brahmins. Then, while the brahmin students Vasettha and Bharadvaja were walking and wandering for exercise, this discussion arose between them: "How is one a brahmin?"

The brahmin student Bharadvaja said: "When one is well-born on both sides, of pure maternal and paternal descent seven generations back, unassailable and impeccable in respect of birth, then one is a brahmin."
The brahmin student Vasettha said: "When one is virtuous and fulfills the observances, then one is a brahmin."
But the brahmin student Bharadvaja could not convince the brahmin student Vasettha, nor could the brahmin student Vasettha convince the brahmin student Bharadvaja.

Then the brahmin student Vasettha addressed the brahmin student Bharadvaja: "Sir, the recluse Gotama, the son of the Sakyans who went forth from a Sakyan clan, is living at Icchanangala, in the wood near Icchanangala. Now a good report of Master Gotama has been spread to this effect 'That Blessed One is accomplished, fully enlightened, perfect in true knowledge and conduct, sublime, knower of worlds, incomparable leader of persons to be tamed, teacher of gods and humans, enlightened, blessed.' Come, Bharadvaja, let us go to the recluse Gotama and ask him about this matter. As he answers, so we will remember it."
"Yes, sir," the brahmin student Bharadvaja replied. 

Then the two brahmin students, Vasettha and Bharadvaja, went to the Blessed One and exchanged greetings with him. When this courteous and amiable talk was finished, they sat down at one side and the brahmin student Vasettha addressed the Blessed One in stanzas thus:

Vasettha
"We are both acknowledged to possess The knowledge we claim of the Triple Veda,
For I am Pokkharasati's pupil And he a pupil of Tarukkha.

We have attained full mastery Over all that the Vedic experts teach;
Skilled in philology and grammar We match our teachers in discussion.

A dispute has arisen between us, Gotama, Concerning the question of birth and class:
Bharadvaja says one is a brahmin by birth, While I hold one is a brahmin by action.
Know this, O Seer, as our debate.

Since neither of us could convince the other, Or make him see his point of view,
We have come to ask you, sir, Widely famed to be a Buddha.

As people turn with palms upraised Towards the moon when it reaches fullness,
So in the world do they venerate you And pay homage to you, Gotama.

So now we ask of you, Gotama, The eye uprisen in the world: Is one a brahmin by birth or action?
Explain to us who do not know How we should recognize a brahmin." 


Buddha

"I will explain to you as they really are, Vasettha" said the Blessed One,
"The generic divisions of living beings; For many are the kinds of birth.

Know first the grass and trees: Though they lack self-awareness,
Their birth is their distinctive mark; For many are the kinds of birth.

Next come the moths and butterflies And so on through as far as ants:
Their birth is their distinctive mark; For many are the kinds of birth.

Then know the kinds of quadrupeds of varied sorts both small and large:
Their birth is their distinctive mark; For many are the kinds of birth.

Know those whose bellies are their feet, To wit, the long-backed class of snakes:
Their birth is their distinctive mark; For many are the kinds of birth.

Know too the water-dwelling fish That pasture in the liquid world:
Their birth is their distinctive mark; For many are the kinds of birth.

Next know the birds that wing their way As they range in open skies:
Their birth is their distinctive mark; For many are the kinds of birth.

 "While in these births the differences Of birth make their distinctive mark,
With humans no differences of birth Make a distinctive mark in them.

Nor in the hairs nor in the head Nor in the ears nor in the eyes
Nor in the mouth nor in the nose Nor in the lips nor in the brows;

Nor in the shoulders or the neck Nor in the belly or the back
Nor in the buttocks or the breast Nor in the anus or genitals;

Nor in the hands nor in the feet Nor in the fingers or the nails
Nor in the knees nor in the thighs Nor in their color or in voice:
Here birth makes no distinctive mark As with the other kinds of birth.

In human bodies in themselves Nothing distinctive can be found.
Distinction among human beings Is purely verbal designation.

"Who makes his living among men By agriculture, you should know Is called a farmer,
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.

Who makes his living among men By varied crafts, you should know Is called a craftsman,
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.

Who makes his living among men By merchandise, you should know Is called a merchant,
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin. 

Who makes his living among men By serving others, you should know Is called a servant,
Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.

Who makes his living among men By stealing, you should know Is called a robber, Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.
Who makes his living among men By archery, you should know Is called a soldier, Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.
Who makes his living among men By priestly craft, you should know Is called a chaplain, Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.
Whoever governs among men The town and realm, you should know Is called a ruler, Vasettha; He is not a brahmin.

"I call him not a brahmin Because of his origin and lineage. If impediments still lurk in him,
He is just one who says 'Sir.'Who is unimpeded and clings no more: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has cut off all fetters And is no more by anguish shaken,
Who has overcome all ties, detached: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has cut each strap and thong, The reins and bridle-band as well,
Whose shaft is lifted, the awakened one: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who endures without a trace of hate Abuse, violence, and bondage too,
With strength of patience well arrayed: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who does not flare up with anger, Dutiful, virtuous, and humble,
Subdued, bearing his final body: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who, like the rain on lotus leaves, Or mustard seed on the point of an awl,
Clings not at all to sensual pleasures: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who knows right here within himself The destruction of all suffering,
With burden lowered, and detached: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who with deep understanding, wise, Can tell the path from the not-path
And has attained the goal supreme: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Aloof alike from householders And those gone into homelessness,
Who wanders without home or wish: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has laid aside the rod Against all beings frail or bold,
Who does not kill or have them killed: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who is unopposed among opponents, Peaceful among those given to violence,
Who does not cling among those who cling: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has dropped all lust and hate, Dropped conceit and contempt,
Like mustard seed on the point of an awl: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who utters speech free from harshness, Full of meaning, ever truthful,
Which does not damage anyone: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who in the world will never take What is not given, long or short,
Small or big or fair or foul: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has no more inner yearnings Regarding this world and the next,
Who lives unyearning and detached: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has no more indulgences No more perplexity since he knows
Through having reached the Deathless Sphere: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who, by transcending all ties here About both merit and evil deeds,
Is sorrowless, stainless, and pure: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who, pure as the spotless moon, Is clear and limpid,
and in whom Delight and being have been destroyed: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has passed beyond the swamp, The mire, samsara, all delusion,
Who has crossed to the further shore And meditates within the jhanas,
Is unperturbed and unperplexed, Attained Nibbana through no clinging:
He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has abandoned sensual pleasures And wanders here in homelessness
With sense desires and being destroyed: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has abandoned craving too, And wanders here in homelessness,
With craving and being both destroyed: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who leaves behind all human bonds And has cast off the bonds of heaven,
Detached from all bonds everywhere: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who leaves behind delight and discontent, Who is cool and without attachment,
The hero who has transcended the whole world: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who knows how beings pass away To reappear in many a mode,
Unclutching he, sublime, awake: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Whose destination is unknown To gods, to spirits, and to men,
An arahant with taints destroyed: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who has no impediments at all, Before, behind, or in the middle,
Who is unimpeded and clings no more: He is the one I call a brahmin. 

 The herd's leader, perfected hero, The great seer whose victory is won,
Unperturbed, cleansed, awakened: He is the one I call a brahmin.

Who knows his manifold past lives And sees the heavens and states of woe,
Who has reached the destruction of birth: He is the one I call a brahmin.

"For name and clan are assigned As mere designations in the world;
Originating in conventions, They are assigned here and there.

For those who do not know this fact, Wrong views have long underlain their hearts;
Not knowing, they declare to us: 'One is a brahmin by birth.'

One is not a brahmin by birth, Nor by birth a non-brahmin.
By action is one a brahmin, By action is one a non-brahmin.

For men are farmers by their acts, And by their acts are craftsmen too;
And men are merchants by their acts, And by their acts are servants too.

And men are robbers by their acts, And by their acts are soldiers too;
And men are chaplains by their acts, And by their acts are rulers too.

"So that is how the truly wise, see action as it really is,
Seers of dependent origination, Skilled in action and its results.

Action makes the world go round, Action makes this generation turn.
Living beings are bound by action Like the chariot wheel by the pin.

Asceticism, the holy life, Self-control and inner training
By this one becomes a brahmin, In this supreme brahminhood lies.

One possessing the triple knowledge, Peaceful, with being all destroyed:
Know him thus, O Vasettha, As Brahma and Sakka for those who understand."

When this was said, the brahmin students Vasettha and Bharadvaja said to the Blessed One: "Magnificent, Master Gotama! Magnificent, Master Gotama!...From today let Master Gotama remember us as lay followers who have gone to him for refuge for life." 


In summary, at Icchanakala there were two young brahmins, Vāsettha and Bhāradvāja who were arguing on what makes a true brahmin. Bhāradvāja maintained that it was pure descent from seven generations of ancestors, with neither break nor blemish in the lineage, whereas Vāsettha contended that virtue and moral behaviour made a true brahmin. As neither could convince the other, they agreed to refer the matter to the Buddha, who said it was not by birth but by one's own actions which made the true brahmin. Buddha replied Vasettha in verses that people are classified by their occupations but there is no one more superior than another because of birth. A true brahmin is one who is virtuous, abandoned cravings, destroyed all taints, practiced the noble eightfold path. 

References:
1. www.accesstoinsight.org
2. https://suttacentral.net/
3. The middle length discourses of the Buddha (Bhikkhu Bodhi)

Saturday, August 17, 2019

States of the Matter is the States of the Mind


States of the Matter is the States of the Mind

I must have some Linux Input (as a gratitude to its stability opposed to the entropy or disorderliness of my thinking habits) to begin with.

Debian 10 is out and my Debian 9 is functioning well and I won’t rush to update my system.

My thinking habits have improved due to two books (thanks to my wife and British Council Library in particular) I borrowed from the Library.

One is Human growth after Birth that has chapter on mathematical model for growth (biological as opposed to physical) and the other is States of the Matter, States of the Mind (a treatise in physics I love, in smaller doses).

The biological order and life (and the planet itself) is completely unthinkable in a world of entropy (substitute disorder, better still chaos).

Whereas disorder is the ground rule of the universe (if there is no disorder, there is no possibility of evolving universes- in plural).

Internet and Information (faked news) Transfer is also under disorder and chaos principle and one should not try to respond to them (Facebook and Whatsapp users, please note).

In other words Darwin’s evolution applies to the universe, too.

Our universe is one out of many practically useless universes.

Now the bombshell and there was no account of dark energy or dark matter in this book except a passing comment.

My theory is that all the black holes are spewing out galaxies (better term new worlds) from the other end of the black holes which we cannot see and the rules of physics and constants are different from ours.

So unifying theory of physics (like god created everything from nothing) and ultimate mathematical models are redundant.

In another words black holes are subjected to Darwin’s principles.

So do not kill (he did not have all the fossil evidence) Darwin.

He was the greatest thinker we ever had and not the Bible’s thinking in a rigid (inside and never outside the box) box. 

Now I call it the fourth dimension of thinking for lack of a proper word (borrowing from mathematical dimensions) or phrase (beyond three dimensions).

For the outside the box thinking, I take pride of knowing late Prof.A.D.P. Kalansuria and his introduction to me, the basic principles of philosophy.

Of course Bertram Russel contributed enormously to free thinking.

The current political disorder or entropy in Ceylon is embedded in our genes.

It will be more chaotic than the dynamics of physics.

Best way to avoid is to give a holiday to TV and buy some (according to your liking except politics) books and read and divert your mind and preferably give attention to your mind.

Meditation may be an escape.

Mind you reading Carl Marx is not prohibited but not Sigmund Freud (he did a bad job since he did not study our politicians' sexual deviations).

Friday, August 16, 2019

Skin Colour

Skin Colour and Pigmentation

I was trying to find an article on pigmentation on big Medical Texts and could not.

This was an extraction from a very old power point presentation.

I have destroyed my notes by conviction.

When we were medical students there were good articles on pigmentation, not now (? new policy).


I am much interested in Guppy and Zebra fish pigmentation not human.


Skin Colour


Skin colour is determined by two factors.

One is the amount of melanin formed in response to sun's radiation effects.

This amount of formation of melanin is determined by different  alleles and are poly-geneticaly inherited.

There is hardly any difference between whites and blacks in melanin formation
.

The second is the packaging of that melanin in membrane bound packs.

White skin people lack the ability to form (
melanasome melanisation) membrane bound packages efficiently.

Melanosomes are either degraded or dispersed in white skin.

It is a genetic deficiency and not a superior quality of white man.
White man is deficient and why and when this happened is currently unknown.

That is why they are prone to cancer and a very serious condition, the malignant melanoma.
They cannot sun bathe in reality.
This happened during their migration while dark skinned people retained that ability and were protected from cancer.

Additionally dark skin is resistant to weathering and old age.

Melanins

The are several varieties of melanins

Eumelanin
Dark brown melanin proper
Chemically an insoluble polymer of tyrosine
Phaeomelanin
Yellow or red skinheads
Chemically a polymer of tyrosine and cysteine, soluble in alkali solutions
The are several varieties of melanins
Eumelanin is present in skin, hair, pigment epithelium of the eye, in the meninges, in brain stem (substantia nigra) and adrenal medulla
All these organs are ectodermal in origin like the nervous system
Produced by the melanocytes and are packed membrane bound and are transmitted to surrounding keratinocytes.
Each melanocyte actively implants its granules into the body of the nearby cells.
One melanocyte supplies melanin to thirty-three keratinocytes according to signals from the keratinocytes.
In other words roughly 100 cells of the epidermis have three melanocytes.

Black Skins
In black skin the melanosomes which are larger than those of white skin remain free.

White Skins
In white skin the melanosomes are taken up by the autophagosomes and are degradaed.
They are dispersed lightly causing the social pathology

Light absorption
Functions of Eumelanin is to bsorb ultraviolet and visible light and get oxidized in the process
It is a Free Radical sink, so prevent carcinogenesis.
Black skin ages better than whites
It is an Ion-exchange resin
Melanin is an electron acceptor and binds many drugs Chlorpromazine
Melanins are biologically very important but very little is understood
Their physiochemical properties are frustrating to the chemists
Much remains to be learned
Little fish called Zebra (also Guppy) is unraveling its mysteries
The pathology of melanin is largely a matter of increased or decreased pigmentation
Hypopigmentation
Hyperpigmentation