MAD- Mutually Assured Destruction-Uncertainty Principle in Action

 MAD

Mutually Assured Destruction

Uncertainty Principle in Action

This was written sometime back as the first chapter in my book

"Uncertainty Is The Certainty"

The current War Posturing in the Middle East was not in my mind.

I need add  few lines to this chapter without bias.

The original ideas was to bring out this "Uncertainty Principle in Dhamma" but myself being a simple scientific guy expanded it to many fields and Cloud Forming is something that defy scientific analysis, especially General Physics .

Thankfully I did not publish the book due to many reasons including laziness.

Uncertainty Principle at its Best

War Games 

War

Artificial Intelligence 

End Gam

This piece is to highlight that the "War of Attrition" has no currency when AI is at work. Nobody seems to have understood the precarious situation. I do not think even China has given credence to this situation which is evolving (AI).

However, China is obsessed with AI, why I do not know.

Russia in my belief does not believe in efficiency of the AI operations. It may be useful in a battle situation where surprise is intended. They, however, still believe in human intelligence supervising the AI coterie (guys and girls behind the drones). 

I think Russians are becoming battle smart simply because of the current exposure.

I do not want to use the term AI spy agents.

They have boots on the ground.

If AI is given the full control what evolves has no logic or algorithm. 

As far as Iran is concerned, Americans do not have reliable boots on the ground and depend heavily on AI gathered intelligence.

At best AI stops at 95% efficiency.

The 5% outlier is the one which leads to catastrophe in a AI battle of supremacy. 

The End Game has no logical endpoint but depends on the redundant data set of uncertainty. 

It is presumed to be infinity.

Infinity has a different physical connotation.

As for knee jerk reaction, I think we have to worry and suspect Americans would jump the gun prematurely.

A preemptive strike.

Beware.

By the way, Ukranian War, is an American manufactured war. 

Russia never wanted a war in Ukraine but they preferred negotiations. 

It was the war monger, Boris Johnson who coaxed Zelensky into war path. Already one million Ukrainians have scarified their life to war of attrition.

It is easy to start a War.

It is very difficult to stop the War.

In human terms at this point of time, diplomacy, may or may not work.

The stakes are very high.

Then man made devices are used preemptively in the past. We have a good examples in history, the Atomic Bomb in Japan did end the World War II.

Unfortunately, we never managed to come to term with Strategic Arms Control for a sustainable period of time in our history. The Treaty for  Nuclear Arms Control ends in 2025. This was extended unilaterally by Russia for another year.

There is no attempt to reactivate this Treaty.

Due to Presidential election in USA, no attempt to end this war was envisaged.

Status quo remains fragile.

Democratic mechanisms may fail in this type of scenario.

One man rule like in China may fail.

Dialogue may fail.

We have a inflexible president in power, at a time where diplomacy is at zero strength.

The end game or end point is in "a state of flux".

When we have unstable leaders who do not have mature advisers to lead them, the tendency to rely on AI is realistic. 

Paradoxically guys who may be eyeing for a regime change in USA may become proactive.

This was regime change in reverse gear.      

The man who envisaged Regime Change in Russia will be a victim of his own devises.

The pendulum swings from war to no war.

Putting the finger on the AI button, is a realistic probability.

It is literally called the "Panic Button". 

This is an example of “Uncertainty Principle”, hard at work. 

Victory is uncertain but stale mate is factual.

 War posturing against Iran by Israel was evident. 

The 12 day attempt at regime change did not come to fruition. 

The tendency is the same but this time Iran is well prepared and there seem to be some cohesion with Russia and China. 

It is most likely in the surveillance strategy which Iran refused in the first instance.

Everything is volatile.

Two guys over 80 heading is bit dicy.

I would stop at that.