Saturday, December 7, 2019

Discipline-Vinaya

REPRODUCTION
Discipline - Vinaya

Vinaya — the disciplinary code of Buddhist monks and nuns

By D. Amarasiri Weeraratne
The Vinaya constitutes the disciplinary code of conduct for Buddhist monks and nuns. The Buddhist Sangha consists of both monks and nuns, and not monks only as ignorantly believed by many Sinhalese Buddhists. 
Buddhist monks have to observe 227 Vinaya rules, and the nuns have to observe 311 rules. 

When both monks and nuns are novices (Samanera) i.e. before higher ordination they have to observe only ten Precepts known as Dasa Sila.

The Buddha expected the Sangha to continue to observe the Vinaya rules in the original spirit with changes in the minor rules if deemed necessary by the majority of the Sangha. 

The Buddha said, "O monks! So long as you will not enact new rules and will not abolish existing ones the Sangha may be expected to prosper and not decline".

The history of Buddhist countries shows that when the monks neglected the precepts and became lax and corrupt Buddhism declined. It revived again when Sasana reforms were effected and monks observed the Vinaya properly. 
Lay person play an important part in helping monks to observe the Vinaya. 
Monks depend on lay persons for their material needs. So it is important that laymen should know the fundamentals of the Vinaya. Then they can support the monks to lead the holy life. 

If lay people are totally ignorant of the Vinaya they could spoil the monks, condone wrong behaviour, and will not be able to differentiate between a good monk and corrupt apostate.

The Buddha advocated that the Vinaya should be available for all to see. He said, "Monks, there are three things which shine when not hidden, viz. the sun, moon and the Dhamma-Vinaya". Therefore, it is important that lay persons should have a basic knowledge of the Vinaya. 

The Dasa Sil Mata nuns observe only the Ten Precepts of the novices and they are not required to observe the 311 rules for fully ordained nuns.

Eight Categories
The Vinaya-rules of the Sangha are classified into eight classes. 
They are;
1. Parajika, 
2. Sanghadisesa, 
3. Aniyata,
4. Nissaggiya-pacittiya, 
5. Pacittiya, 
6. Patidesaniya, 
7. Sekhiya, 
8, Adikarana Samptha.

The first two incur heavy offenses, while the rests incur light offenses. They are redeemable by confession to another monk. 

Only the more important rules concerning lay-people will be discussed in this article.

Capital offenses Parajika
There are four parajikas or rules of defeat. Any monk or nun who breaks any one of the rules is automatically "defeated". He/she falls from monkhood/nunhood even if he or she wears the yellow robe. 

Also he/she is not allowed to enter the Sangha in this life-time. 

The first parajika forbids sexual intercourse. 

Therefore in Buddhism, a monk could never have a wife. 

The second rule forbids stealing any object of value over Rs. 1500.

The third rule forbids killing a human being. 

The fourth forbids making false claims to supernatural psychotic attainments i.e.Jjhana or even Arahantship. 

Willful intention is necessary for these acts to constitute an offense.

Pardonable after Penance Sanghadiesa
There are; 
13 Sanghadisesa offenses. 
They entail a formal meeting of the Sangha. Any monk/nun violating these rules has to undergo a period of penance. After this, if the offender shows repentance he/she may be reinstated by an order not less than 20 monks/nuns. 

The second sanghidisesa forbids physical contact with a woman/man with lustful intention (like some politicians most current monks are homosexuals)
 

Besides this handling money, gold, silver, gems, and such valuable, animal traps, weapons, musical instruments and fruits on trees constitute Sanghadisesa offenses. 

A Buddhist monk cannot solemnize marriages like Hindu or Christian priests.

The 13th Sanghadisasa forbids over-association with lay families or behaving like a layman. 
He cannot give gifts to layman hoping for return. Bad behaviour entails playing or associating with girls, playing-games, singing, dancing, etc.

Doubtful cases Aniyata
These are two indefinite offenses when a monk is accused of being with a woman in a secluded or screened place. If the monk devise misconduct and no one has seen misconduct, he gets the benefit of the doubt, unless there is over-riding evidence.

Expiatiables Nissaggiya-Pacittiya
These constitute 30 rules which entail expiation with forfeiture of the disallowed articles. 
The monk has to confess his guilt.
Rules 6, 7 and 8 concern ‘Pavarana’ or invitation. Generally, a monk may not ask for something form a lay-person unless it is a reaction or a lay-person who has consented to be a supporter. 
An example of a dedicated lay-supporter is a man who says ‘Rev. Sir as long as you stay here when you are in need of any permissible requisite ask me and I shall be glad to comply’.
Rules 12 and 13 concern using an item considered luxurious. 

The Buddha inculcated frugality and contentment with little. 

He forbade items considered luxurious to a monk

Expensive carpets and rugs, richly embroidered coverlet and in the present age we may include air-conditioning units, T.V. sets etc. 

Here we have to take into consideration that items considered luxuries of one age become necessities in another.


Rule 18 concerns money. 
A monk may not receive directly any money for himself, for others, nor even for the monastery, etc

He may direct a donor to put a donation into a donation box or bank account only if the donation is for the monastery fund, orphanage fund or any such impersonal fund. A monk may direct the use of such funds, but lay-persons have to handle financial matters. There is an allowance called Mendaka allowance for a lay-person to deposit money with a monk’s lay-attendant, or patron for the monk’s personal use. The lay-attendant has to do the monetary transactions — A Sangha Trust is a modern practical way of a accepting and administrating money and property for the benefit of the Sangha. Reliable trustees could administrate the trust, and the Sangha may advice them in their work.

Rule 19 forbids buying and selling to a monk. Since a monk cannot handle money he can neither buy nor sell. 

A monk is not allowed to possess money, gold, silver, gems and similar valuables. He cannot possess land, animals, slaves, animal-traps, weapons or musical instruments.
Rule 23 concerns medicines or seven day allowances which a monk may keep.

92 Expiatables - Pacittiya
There are 92 rules which entail expiation. 
The fifth rule for bids a monk to sleep with a young novice for more than three consecutive nights. 
Rule 6 forbids him to sleep in the same place with a woman. Therefore a monk if invited to stay with lay people should be given a separate room.
According to rule number 7, a monk cannot speak more than six sentences to a woman without a man present. The man or boy should be able to understand what is spoken. This rules limits a monk to speaking only the minimum necessary words to a woman-alone. The eight rules debate a monk from speaking of his super normal attainments even if true to lay-persons. The ninth rule forbids a monk to disclose another monk's offenses to laymen.

According to the tenth rule a monk cannot dig the earth if it contains worms, insects, vegetation etc. 

He can give an indirect request to a layman, "we need a pit" etc. 

A monk is not allowed to damage plant life, cut-grass, pluck-flowers etc. 

He has to remove the seeds before eating fruits.

Rule 35 concerns a monk taking only one main meal a day. He can take nourishing drinks in the forenoon. He has to take his midday meal before 12 noon. Rules 44 and 45 forbid him to be along with a woman in a screened place — a repetition of the aniyata rule.
 

Rules 48-50 forbid a monk to go and see a military establishment, a battle or an army parade. 
 

He may go for a valid reason to speak the Dhamma or visit a sick person for a religious purpose. In terms of rule 65 a candidate for higher ordination should be 20 years of age.
Nowadays there seem to be no age limit for ordination of novice-monks. 
Originally it was 15, but now they say a boy who can scare away a crow can be admitted.  

Rule 67 forbids a monk going on a journey with a woman having made an arrangement before hand. 

Rules 74 and 75 disallows a monk to resort to violence. 

Rules 87 and 88 restrict the use of expensive furniture.
Confessional
Patidesaniya

These four entail confession, and are minor matters.
Training and Deportment
Sekhiya
There are 75 Sekhiya rules. They are rules of training concerning deportment. 57-72 concern teaching dhamma to lay-people.
A monk is not allowed to practice palmistry and fortune telling, astrology, making charms, exorcism. 
Nor can he practice medicine for money. 
A detailed list of forbidden arts, crafts and professions is given in the Samanaphala Sutra and Ambatta Sutra.

Nagaravindeyya Sutra
In the Nagaravindeyya Sutra the Buddha told lay-people who visited him which monks and Brahmins were worthy of respect and honour. "Those monks and Brahmins who are not rid of greed, hate and delusion regarding pleasures of the senses, whose minds are disturbed by passions, whose behaviour is righteous at times and righteous in others — such monks and Brahmins need not be respected, honoured or venerated." 

When asked how they could judge the worthy the Buddha said "It is in so far as these venerable men frequent sylvan hermitages, and keeps away from the madding crowds. In the sylvan hermitages there would be no forms, sounds, and other temptation to distract their minds. On account of this we can say "surely these venerable ones are either free from greed, hate and delusion or are treading the path that leads to the elimination of greed, hate and delusion."
The way that leads to the removal of greed, hate and delusion, is the noble Eightfold Path consisting of Sila (Virtue), Samadhi (Meditation) and Pragnya (Wisdom). 
Thus it can be understood that if a monk does not uphold the Vinaya-precepts sincerely, he is far from the path that leads to the elimination of greed, hate and delusion. Then he need not be honoured, respected and venerated as a true son of the Buddha (Buddha-putra). 
Thus, it is important that lay-Buddhists should have at least an elementary knowledge of the Vinaya to distinguish between genuine monks, and worldly bhikkhus pursuing the path of greed, hate and delusion.

Revision of Vinaya
The late Ven. Walpola Rahula, when he was alive advocated the revision of the Vinaya rules at an international conference of the Sangha, where Hinayana and Mahayana monks and nuns were present. He pointed out that many rules are out of date and require revision. The rules were enacted 2500 years ago when monks were itinerant ascetics in India. 
Since then the Sangha has passed to the sectarian stage, and arrived at the monastic stage. Social, economic and political conditions have undergone vast changes. The Vinaya rules are superannuated and require revision.
In the Maha Parinirvana Sutra towards the end of his life, the Buddha permitted the Sangha to revise the Vinaya rules where necessary by common consent in keeping with changed conditions of the future. However, they have to conform to the spirit and objectives of the original Vinaya. He has given four guidelines within which framework this could be done. They are called Vinaya Satara Apadana.
But the Sangha has been so conservative and backward that they would not consider revising the Vinaya at the 6th Council held at Rangoon in the Buddha Jayanti year the Sangha Elders greeted with laughter the idea of amending the Vinaya. Therefore the appeal of Ven. W. Rahula fell on deaf ears. Today we have the ludicrous spectacle of the hierarchy refusing to revise the Vinaya while at the same time they turn a blind eye to all the Vinaya violations that are a common everyday occurrence in Sri Lanka. And there are enough apologists to rationalize and defend the present apostasies.
"The observance of the Vinaya constitutes the longevity of the Sasana. When the Vinaya is observed the Sasana stands." 

These are the words of the First Council Elders. 
From this, we can infer in which direction Buddhism in Sri Lanka is heading.






Friday, December 6, 2019

Small is beautiful-Linux

Small is beautiful-Linux

One does not need a high Linux distribution to to do productive work.

Carry the stuff in a USB stick.

One need a USB stick (bigger the better, at least 64 GiB) and a few iso images downloaded including Linux MultiSystem boot DVD.

Steps

1. Write image to a DVD
2. Boot the DVD
3. Stick a USB (one may have to remove it and insert it again)
4. Write the GRUB boot loader on the stick
5. Drop the iso images to the graphic utility.
6. Wait for it to make a sfs file
7. Repeat till the USB is full

I divide my USB into two, one for Multisystem the other for nfts for my data.
Please do not confuse with Pendrive Linux site (it is probably not active now)
Pendrive Linux (256 USB stick of those days) was my first entry to USB booting using Puppy Linux!

 

Kali Linux fails my Linux Test

Kali Linux fails my Linux Test

Casual look at Kali Linux has made me to write this.

It has nothing new for a Linux guy using Debian.

Instead, of helping a Linux newbie, it is trying to sort out guys and girls who pirate (I am totally against pirating) Windows and having problem with booting Windows.
I have never used it in spite of its popularity among hackers.
I prefer Tails, which is SOLID.

I was a Solar Advocate for Ceylon, I am proved wrong!

I was a Solar Advocate for Ceylon with lot of sunshine.

I am proved  wrong.

Its (Solar) half life is pretty short and in my estimate with current pricing of normal electricity (hydroelectric) in Ceylon, the initial infrastructure payment far exceeds my normal payment for my entire life at twilight years.

Reproduction from Scientific American

The Downside of Solar Energy

As renewable energy expands, used photovoltaic panels are creating a growing waste problem—but recycling could be the answer

The solar economy continues its dramatic growth, with over a half-terawatt already installed around the world generating clean electricity. But what happens to photovoltaic (PV) modules at the end of their useful life? With lifespans measured in decades, PV-waste disposal may seem to be an issue for the distant future. Yet, the industry ships millions of tons every year, and that number will continue to rise as the industry grows. Total e-waste—including computers, televisions, and mobile phones—is around 45 million metric tons annually.
By comparison, PV-waste in 2050 will be twice that figure. Motivated by concerns about exposure to toxic materials, increased disposal costs and overcapacity at landfills managed by underfunded local governments, researchers are exploring global solar waste management solutions based on concepts like the circular economy.
At the same time, demand for everything from sand to rare and precious metals continues to rise. While supplying only about 1 percent of global electricity, photovoltaics already relies on 40 percent of the global tellurium supply, 15 percent of the silver supply, a large portion of semiconductor quality quartz supply, and smaller but important segments of the indium, zinc, tin, and gallium supplies. Closing the loop on these metals and embracing circular economy concepts will be critical to the industry’s future.

Europe is leading the way
The leading policy with a proven record of successful end-of-life product management is extended producer responsibility (EPR). A decade ago, European PV manufacturers began participating in a voluntary EPR system called “PV Cycle.” In 2014, when the industry came under the Waste Electronics and Electrical (WEEE) Directive, all manufacturers were required to participate in an EPR program. Since 2009, the EPR program run by PV Cycle has recycled over 30,000 metric tons of PV, and with the establishment of collection centers, has driven a market in second-life PV modules.
In the U.S., there is no federal e-waste regulation to motivate PV-waste collection and recycling. Federal law only requires special management for PV modules that are characterized as hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Some PV modules are considered hazardous waste because of lead or cadmium, others are not considered hazardous waste at all. Since it is not possible to tell whether a PV module is hazardous from visual inspection, many argue it is simpler to collect all PV modules.
States in the U.S. are taking the lead. In 2020, manufacturers wishing to sell into New York or Washington markets, will be required to participate in a take-back and collection or EPR program. Several California agencies, a state with more than half of the nations’ installed PV capacity, recently convened a task force to evaluate options, including EPR, for recycling both PVs and lithium-ion batteries.
Without clear incentives, recycling markets are struggling struggle

Linux for Newbies

Linux for Newbies

This a comment I made in Quora!

Mint was good when it hijacked proprietary codec when Linux was new to the commercial market.
Now Linux can standalone without proprietary STUFF (it has better stuff NOW) with over 300 active (some dedicated for Linux Developers) distributions.
In my blog site I have had a run down on most of them BUT I rarely write about them except USING Debian (Big Brother with lot little brothers) exclusively.
Regards to Mint (I never used it-re codec violations, mentioned above), it has a beautiful and an impressive desktop but it is nowhere near Debian’s STABILITY.
Even Ubuntu (Debian derivative) Unity desktop is falling behind.
My advice is to learn (lot of help and FULL documentation) using Debian, even though the learning curve is steep.
Lot of other distributions are short of documentation (last Linux Bible was out in 2010) and learning help.
The general community (not the dedicated) in general is aggressive to newbies but take them on the bump.
There is a Linux Magazine coming from Germany that does a wonderful service for Linux community.

Sunday, December 1, 2019

KnoppixV8.6.1-2019-10-14-Edition

KnoppixV8.6.1-2019-10-14-Edition

KnoppixV8.6.1 is out.
It is pretty good and can be mounted on a DVD.
(The earlier comments unable to write on a DVD was due to a faulty DVD)!
Instead write or boot on a USB of at least 8 GiB for persistent mounting.
It has three desktops, mainly LXD, KDE and Gnome. 

One should have at least 4 GiB of RAM for full functionality.
It is one of my favorite distributions.

Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Outliers and Alcoholic Binge

Outliers and Alcoholic Binge

I must relate three of my own experiences, one in Ceylon and two in UK.

The information is not second hand.

I was the Junior Cadet Team in a Catholic school but refused to join the Senior Cadet Team in a Buddhist School few years later and I was caned and hit with a sturdy hibiscus pole by the Vice Principle (luckily the sports master was related to me) twice but stood firm and my goal was to enter the university, not to become a officer cadet. 
In defense of him, I must say he helped me when the gang of teachers orchestrated a organized scathing attack personally on me.
I took a challenge with one of them, and said “you got to leave this school”, if I get to the university without their help.

Suffice is to say all of them left within six months.
I of course took the security of informing the School Inspector well in advance of the University Entrance.

I was more interested in physics even now but their harassment made me to take the easy option of joining the biology stream.
I was good in physics and mathematics and would have made it through, if I did the mathematics stream as well, with little bit of luck.
In the Peradeniya university, I escaped the ragging during English course.
I finished my English test half an hour early and ran away before the guys came in.
Did not bother to attend the medical examination.
Within the university we formed a group in the first year and made sure our group (including few seniors, one who was national boxer from my school) was never outnumbered.
In a way I had a body guard.
He only wanted few beers for action.
Within a few years we were polishing Pilsner, Lion Larger/Stout, Three Coins, Gin and Tonic, Mendis Special and never arrack but V.S.O.A as a DMO.

Kithul (Palm) Toddy on return journey was my fee after a postmortem of a putrefying body with the help of police.
Story One-1
One of my classmates invited me (no accommodation offered) in East London.
He pushed me to the 6th beer (not Ceylon mugs) which was one more than my small stomach could manage.
I pretended to be “vomitish’ but held it until we went from the bar to the third floor of his quarters.
He was living with a Malaysian girl.
I went to bathroom to void urine and came out and put everything on the new carpet deliberately (I could have done it in the toilet).
Message was indirectly clear.
A good friend won’t push a guy over the limit.
I slept on the floor and that was the last time I met him in UK.
I politely invited him for a dinner at my hospital (without alcohol), when I got my first job in UK.
He never reciprocated.
This is the ploy, I learned in Ceylon.
If somebody invited me for lunch (never accepted dinner) with spirits, I made sure I did exactly what I did in London.
No invitation again and I never took even a sip (exception liqueured chocolates), my entire clinical career while on duty.

Story Two-2
Then my coho (Co-Senior House Officer) Kurian (Indian) who is no more got me to strip to my underwear in my first job in Barnsley in his quarters in front of the nurses (the nurse who was well prepared with many layers of cloth) and the competing nurse would take one layer at a time.
I did not see her bare breasts (middle age woman).
I felt it was a bad joke (jockey) and stripped completely before her turn spoiling their planned crescendo and said why don’t you measure my penis when erect.

Nobody played a practical joke my entire life in UK, thereafter.

My New Zealand time, no similar episodes but I used to devise my own practical jokes in the first three months and never after.


Outliers
I must say I captained the University Hockey team that beat the National champion in penalty shoot out.
No player was harassed during three years of my tenure but I was harassed in the first year solely, due to jealousy.

I have my own ways taking vengeance in a subtle way.
Hazing (US English), initiation ceremonies (British English), bastardisation (Australian English), ragging (South Asia), or deposition, refers to the practice of rituals, challenges, and other activities involving harassment, abuse or humiliation used as a way of initiating a person into a group including a new fraternity, sorority, team, or club.
Hazing is seen in many different types of social groups, including gangs, sports teams, schools, universities, military units, and fraternities and sororities. The initiation rites can range from relatively benign pranks to protracted patterns of behavior that rise to the level of abuse or criminal misconduct.
Hazing is often prohibited by law or prohibited by institutions such as colleges and universities because it may include either physical or psychological abuse, such as humiliation, nudity, or sexual abuse.
At education establishments in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, this practice involves existing students baiting new students and is called ragging.

Outliers and Alcoholic Binge


Outliers and Alcoholic Binge

I must relate three of my own experiences, one in Ceylon and two in UK.

The information is not second hand.

I was the Junior Cadet Team in a Catholic school but refused to join the Senior Cadet Team in a Buddhist School few years later and I was caned and hit with a sturdy hibiscus pole by the Vice Principle (luckily the sports master was related to me) twice but stood firm and my goal was to enter the university not to become a officer cadet. 
In defense of him, I must say he helped me when the gang of teachers orchestrated a organized scathing attack personally on me.
 
I took a challenge with one of them, and said “you got to leave this school”, if I get to the university without their help.
I off course took the security of informing the School Inspector well in advance of the University Entrance.
I was more interested in physics even now but their harassment made me to take the easy option of joining the biology stream.
I was good in physics and mathematics and would have made it through, if I did the mathematics, with little bit of luck.
In the Peradeniya university, I escaped the ragging during English course.
I finished my English test half an hour early and ran away before the guys came in. Did not bother to attend the medical examination.
Within the university we formed a group in the first year and made sure our group (including few seniors one who was national boxer from my school) was never outnumbered.
In a way I had a body guard.
He only wanted few beers for action.
 
Within a few years we were polishing Pilsner, Lion Larger/Stout, Three Coins, Gin and Tonic of Mendis Special and Never arrack but V.S.O.A as a DMO.
 
Kithul Toddy on return journey after a postmortem of a putrefying body with the help of police.
 
Story One-1
One of my classmates invited me (no accommodation offered) in East London.
He pushed me to the 6th beer (not Ceylon mugs) which was one more than my small stomach could manage.
I pretended to be “vomitish’ but held it until we went from the bar to the third floor of his quarters.
He was living with a Malaysian girl.
I went to bathroom to void urine and came out and put everything on the new carpet deliberately (I could have done it in the toilet).
Message was indirectly clear.
A good friend won’t push a guy over the limit.
I slept on the floor and that was the last time I met him in UK.
I politely invited him for a dinner at my hospital (without alcohol), when I got my first job in UK.
He never reciprocated.
This is the ploy, I learned in Ceylon.
 
If somebody invited me for lunch (never accepted dinner) with spirits, I made sure I did exactly what I did in London.
No invitation again and I never took even a sip (exception liquored chocolates), my entire clinical career while on duty.
 
  Story Two-2
Then my coho (Co-Senior House Officer) Kurian (Indian) who is no more got me to strip to my underwear in my first job in Barnsley in his quarters in front of the nurses (the nurse who was well prepared with many layers of cloth) and the competing nurse would take one layer at a time.
 
I felt it was a bad joke (jock) and stripped completely before the turn spoiling their planned crescendo and said why don’t you measure my penis when erect.
Nobody played a practical joke my entire life in UK, thereafter.
My New Zealand time, no similar episodes but I used devise my own practical jokes in the first three months and never after.

 

 Outliers

I must say I captained the University Hockey team that beat the National champion in penalty shoot out.
 
No player was harassed during three years of my tenure but I was harassed due to jealousy.
 
I have my own ways taking vengeance in a subtle way
Hazing (US English), initiation ceremonies (British English), bastardisation (Australian English), ragging (South Asia), or deposition, refers to the practice of rituals, challenges, and other activities involving harassment, abuse or humiliation used as a way of initiating a person into a group including a new fraternity, sorority, team, or club.
Hazing is seen in many different types of social groups, including gangs, sports teams, schools, universities, military units, and fraternities and sororities. The initiation rites can range from relatively benign pranks to protracted patterns of behavior that rise to the level of abuse or criminal misconduct.
Hazing is often prohibited by law or prohibited by institutions such as colleges and universities because it may include either physical or psychological abuse, such as humiliation, nudity, or sexual abuse.
At education establishments in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, this practice involves existing students baiting new students and is called ragging.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Birds of feather flock together

Birds of feather flock together

I have still not recovered from the demise (five years ago) of our dog (not really mine but my daughter's).
I believe he is in heaven and is acting as a guardian angle for many if not for us.
It is said all dogs go to heaven and all politician of Ceylon go to hell (even there they keep on fighting)!

His departure has made some unexpected dividends for me.
I left the roof top garden to wilderness and quickly all the birds took over the administration of it by default.
Initially to quench the thirst but later to control the number of spiders and still later build nests.
I am not a welcome visitor when the  munia is active.

 


The birds come in flocks and I can identify only five or six birds songs over 20 chirps!
The Mynah, Ceylon Oriole, munia (Butticchas) Kingfisher, Eagles and magpie are the on I can identify.
The rest  are early birds or nocturnal visitors.
There are lot of plants I never planted including pipal tress (Bo Trees), three in number, I potted in.
They are my weather indicators.
Leaves fall with dry season and the new ones come with the first fall of rain.
Its roots are the longest of all and sturdy.
My latest interest is water lilies and with rain there is always a flower to greet us.
This interest I borrowed from water garden concept of current president in waters edge in Battaramulla.
There is a guy there expert in growing lilies, even from seeds not yams.

Can a Tamil walk freely in Sinhalese dominated parts of Sri Lanka without getting attacked in some form?


Naren Selvaratnam, 
Lecturer of Psychology



I am mixed and I went to school in Galle during the wartime. 
I was fine.
My dad is from the north and he has worked in Galle, Hambantota, Badulla, and Kandy.
Even now we live in Kandy where all our neighbors are Sinhala. We are great and get along really well.
Edit 1:
Since some people do not agree with what I have mentioned, I decided to add some more of my experience here. This will help you to decide the accuracy of my claims.
During the 90s and early 20s, we lived in Karapitiya, Galle. Every person in the town knew my parents. We lived in a street where all our neighbors were Sinhalese and Buddhists. All of them visit our home very often and we did visit them too.
You know in the new year, usually, we invite someone to come to our homes first and try the food and make some monetary exchanges right? This is a Sinhalese tradition and is known as “Gey aleya kireema.” One of the known Sinhalese gentleman used to always invite my dad to “aley” his home every new year. This gentleman is a very close friend and also he used to work in the Navy.
This gentleman is Sinhalese and Buddhists. Three of his friends are Tamil, and during Christmas time, all of us get together in another uncle’s home in Galle town. He was a Tamil Christian, died two years back. All the kids play from morning to evening. Some folks are Sinhala, some of us are Tamil. Some gentleman worked in the police, some in the hospital, some in other forces. Also, when we play in this uncle’s house, there were many Muslim families around, and their kids would come and play with us as well. We were a very happy small community.
This uncle who worked in Navy even took us to show the Navy camp in Galle. This uncle worked during the wartime, and he is a good friend of my dad. See these relationships are made of trust with each other. One of my best friend’s dad worked in Navy too, and I went to Math tuition at his place.
Let me tell you this. When I was in school, our Sinhala teacher in grade 6 asked, is there anyone in the class whose mother tongue is not Sinhala. Some students pointed at me. To be honest, Sinhala is my mother tongue and I was not very conversant in Tamil. Our Sinhala teacher told me, “oh why cannot you speak such a beautiful language?” That was his reaction. He got upset that I cannot speak Tamil.
The same happened in grade 11 where our Sinhala teacher said everyone should master the Sinhalese language. Then he paused for like two seconds and had this look at me. Then he smiled and said, “Putha (son), it is not mandatory for you, but I would be very happy if you could master it well.” During this time, I was a very weak student. Just before my O/L, I went to meet him. After I am done worshiping him, he casually touched my head and said, “son, you will be great, and you will do really well I am sure.” Turned out, I did really well academically once I left school.
I do not understand how much I want to write, but nobody every attacked. There were some oddballs here and there. Also, it does not mean that every Tamil guy that we have met were always welcoming. A person’s ethnicity has nothing to do with the mannerism and values.
Karapitiya used to be a very small town when I was a kid. Everyone in the town knew me and everyone was very friendly and they embraced me as their own.
Just because some people do bad stuff, it does not mean everyone is bad. In my opinion, Sinhalese people are a jovial bunch of people. The people you meet in South are far more welcoming and awesome than Sinhalese of any other area. Also, do not have this false belief just because some racists type stuff on FaceBook.

Impeachment


In this country we had an impeachment and the SPEAKER of the house said to have taken a large BRIBE and aborted its progress.

This was related to extra-judicial killing by the Army in 1989.

Extra-judicial killing had gone on ad nauseatum by both major parties from 1970s (when I was in the University).

Students were rounded up and were disposed.

We do not have a "Third Force".

Last year similar bribery took place but the political shady deal was not upheld by the judiciary but lot of money exchanged in bewildering scales.

In this country we do not have parliamentary members but Deal Dasas (most of them are attorneys at law) in plenty.

We have a truncated Democracy with "Deal Dasa and "Athana Methana Rathanas" having shoddy deals!

Impeachment

Reproduction

In new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, most voters think Trump committed abuses — but are split on impeachment

As two weeks of televised impeachment hearings and wall-to-wall coverage came to a close, a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll showed that a majority of registered voters believe Donald Trump abused his powers as president of the United States. But the country remained divided over the question of whether he should be impeached as a result.
The poll was conducted Nov. 20 to Nov. 22. There were five days of televised House Intelligence Committee hearings, ending Thursday, Nov. 21.
When asked to say whether they believe Trump did or did not commit specific acts in connection with Ukraine — the subject of the House impeachment inquiry — 58 percent of registered voters said they believe the president “asked a foreign leader to investigate a political opponent”; 51 percent said they believe he “withheld military aid to Ukraine until they agreed to conduct the investigations he wanted”; and 51 percent said they believe he “abused his powers as president.” (Respondents were not asked about any other allegations against Trump.)
These results suggest that a majority of registered voters have been largely convinced by the case House Democrats are making in Washington: that Trump pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son by using nearly $400 million in military assistance as a quid pro quo — and that he overstepped the bounds of the presidency in the process.
Yet only 48 percent of registered voters said they favor impeaching Trump or removing him from office — slightly more than the 45 percent who opposed impeaching or removing him, but less than a majority.
 
The remaining 7 percent were undecided whether Trump should be impeached or removed, a sign that some registered voters may still be persuadable. And while Republicans and Democrats have largely made up their minds about removal — 83 percent of Republicans oppose it; the same percentage of Democrats are in favor — independents are less certain: A slight plurality of them (40 percent) said Trump should be removed, while another 23 percent said they’re still not sure.
Americans are even divided by party over what they believe the likely outcome of the impeachment inquiry will be. Overall, only 11 percent believed that Trump will be removed from office; a plurality (41 percent) expected impeachment in the House followed by acquittal in the GOP-controlled Senate. That’s a view shared by a majority (54 percent) of Democrats. Yet a majority of Republicans (56 percent) believe that Trump won’t be impeached at all.
These disparities may reflect the fact that Republicans are paying less attention to the impeachment inquiry than Democrats. Fifty-six percent of Democrats said they have been following the congressional hearings “very closely” or “somewhat closely”; among Republicans, that number was 11 percentage points lower.
Regardless, Americans say impeachment will play a big role in how they vote in next November’s congressional elections. Asked to rate how important their current representative’s impeachment vote will be when deciding how to cast their own vote for Congress, Democrats and Republicans were in rare agreement, with 74 percent in both parties saying it will be either “very important” or “somewhat important.”
The survey was conducted by YouGov for Yahoo News. A representative sample of 1,500 adults from YouGov’s research panel were interviewed online. The sample was weighted by age, race, gender, education, voter registration and 2016 presidential vote. The margin of error (MOE) for the full sample was 2.8 percent. The sample included 1,002 registered voters, and the MOE for percentages of registered voters is 3.4%.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

History Repeats itself

History Repeats itself

This is for the Ceylonese who came from abroad for voting to understand the ground reality.
  
Reproduction
Victor Ivon
වික්ටර් අයිවන්

නොවැම්බර් 17 වැනිදා පැවැත්වෙන ජනාධිපතිවරණයේ ප‍්‍රතිඵලය ප‍්‍රකාශ වී නව ජනාධිපතිවරයා දිවුරුම් දීමත් සමග තිබුණු අවලස්සන දේශපාලන ක‍්‍රමයක් අවසන් වී තවත් අවලස්සන දේශපාලන ක‍්‍රමයක් ආරම්භවීමට නියමිතය. 

අවසන් වන්නේ ජේ.ආර්. ජයවර්ධන ඇති කළ ගැහැනියක් පිරිමියෙක් කිරීමට හැර අන් ඕනෑම දෙයක් කිරීමේ බලය තිබූ පරණ ජනාධිපති ක‍්‍රමයයි. 19 වැනි සංශෝධනය නියම වශයෙන් ක‍්‍රියාත්මක වන්නේ එතැන් සිටය. ඉන්පසු ජනාධිපති ක‍්‍රමය තුළ හොඳටම කුණුවූ තත්ත්වයකට පත්ව තිබූ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව හා ඒ ආශ‍්‍රයෙන් ඇතිවන පාර්ලිමේන්තු ආණ්ඩුව රාජ්‍යයේ සියලූ ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති හසුරුවන්නා හා ක‍්‍රියාවට නගන්නා බවට පත්වේ. 

පරණ ක‍්‍රමයේ මරණය සේ ම අලූත් ක‍්‍රමයේ උත්පත්තියද සිදුවන්නේ විධිමත් ආකාරයකට නොව අවිධිමත්් විකෘතිසහගත ආකාරයකටය.

ඊළඟට තේරී පත්වන ජනාධිපති නාමමාත‍්‍රිකය. එහෙත් ඔහු තෝරා පත් කරගැනීම සිදුවන්නේ රාජ්‍යයේ සකලවිධ බලය තිබූ ජනාධිපති තෝරාපත් කරගනුු ලැබූ ආකාරයටමය. එනම් මුළු රටම එක ඡුන්ද කොට්ඨාසයක් ලෙස සලකා පවත්වන ජනාධිපතිවරණයකිනි. සාමාන්‍යයෙන් විධායක බලයක් නැති ජනාධිපතිවරුන් ඒ ආකාරයට තෝරාපත් කරගන්නේ නැත. තෝරා ගන්නේ බොහෝවිට පුංචි ඡුන්ද බල මණ්ඩලයක් මගිනි. ව්‍යවස්ථාව අනුව ජනාධිපතිවරයා නාමමාත‍්‍රික වුවත් තෝරාපත් කරගන්නා ක‍්‍රමය නිසා තෝරාපත් කරගන්නා ජනාධිපතිවරයා නීතියට පටහැනි ලෙස තමන් වෙත බලය හිමිකර ගැනීමේ අවදානමක් පවතී. 


එසේ වුවහොත් මුළු ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රමයම අවුල් ජාලාවක් හා හාස්‍යජනක විගඩමක් බවට පත්වීමේ හැකියාවක් පවතී.

ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රමයේ දක්නට තිබෙන මෙම අවුල්සහගත තත්ත්වයට ආණ්ඩු පක්ෂය පමණක් නොව, මුළු මහත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවම වගකිව යුතුය. ඒ සමගම නීතිපති හා අධිකරණයද වගකිව යුතුය. ඒ සියලූදෙනා ඇතිවී තිබෙන විකෘතියේ ඍජු හෝ අනියම් කොටස්කරුවෝ ලෙස ක‍්‍රියා කළෝය. එම තත්ත්වය රටේ නීති සම්පාදනය හා ඒවා පරීක්ෂාවට ලක් කිරීමට තිබෙන ආයතන ක‍්‍රමය ඇද වැටී තිබෙන බංකොළොත්භාවයේ තරම හොඳින් පෙන්නුම් කරයි.


ගෝඨාභයගේ ප‍්‍රශ්නය


ජයග‍්‍රාහකයා ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ වුවහොත් එය ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රමයේ ඇතිවන විකෘතියේ ස්වභාවය දෙගුණ තෙගුණ කිරීමට හේතුවනු ඇත. එසේ වුවහොත් අධි චෝදනා තිබියදී නාමමාත‍්‍රික වශයෙන් හෝ රාජ්‍ය නායකත්වයට මහජන ඡුන්දයෙන් තේරී පත්වන ලෝකයේ පළමු රාජ්‍ය නායකයා ලෙස ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ ඉතිහාසයට එකතු වනු ඇත. අධි චෝදනා පත‍්‍රයක් යනු සාමාන්‍ය චෝදනා පත‍්‍රයක් නොවේ. බලය ලත් අධිකාරියක් විසින් කරන ලද පරීක්ෂණවලින් පසුව එම පරීක්ෂණයේ නිරීක්ෂණ නීතිපතිගේද අනුමැතිය ඇතිව පහළ අධිකරණය වෙනුවට ඉහළ අධිකරණය වෙත ඉදිරිපත් කර චෝදනා පත‍්‍රයකි. ගෝඨාභයගේ පුරවැසි ප‍්‍රශ්නය හා ඊට අදාළ ගමන් බලපත‍්‍ර හා හැඳුනුම්පත් ප‍්‍රශ්නයද තවමත් පවතින්නේ නොවිසඳුණු ප‍්‍රහේළිකාවක් වශයෙනි.


ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ ආශ‍්‍රයෙන් විසඳී නැති ප‍්‍රශ්නවල ප‍්‍රමාණය ඉන් අවසන්වන්නේ නැත. ඔහුගේ ගමන් බලපත‍්‍රයට අදාළ ලියවිලි ආගමන විගමන දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නොතිබුණි. ජාතික හැඳුනුම්පත‍්‍රයට අදාළ ලියවිල්ලද එම කාර්යාංශයේ නොතිබුණි. මිග් යානා මිලදී ගැනීම පිළිබඳ ප‍්‍රශ්නයේදී ඔහු අධිකරණයට දිවුරා ප‍්‍රකාශ කර තිබුණේ එය රජයන් දෙකක් අතර සිදුවූ ගනුදෙනුවක් බවය. 

එහෙත් ඒ ගැන පසුව පවත්වන ලද පරීක්ෂණයේදී එය රජයන් දෙකක් අතර සිදුවූ ගනුදෙනුවක් නොවන බව සනාථ විය.

එවිට ලංකාවේ ජනාධිපති ලෙස පත්වනු ඇත්තේ නොවිසඳුණු ප‍්‍රශ්න ඇති ප‍්‍රශ්න ගත පුද්ගලයෙකි. නීතිය අනුව ඔහු ඇමරිකන්කාරයෙකු වේ නම් ඇමරිකන් ජාතිකයෙකු ලංකාවේ ජනාධිපති වන පළමු අවස්ථාව එය වනු ඇත. ඔහු ඇමරිකන් ආර්යාවක් සමග ඇමරිකන් දරුවකු ඇති ජනාධිපතිවරයකු වනු ඇත. ඔහු බලයට පත්වුවහොත් ඔහුට එරෙහිව එල්ල වී තිබෙන සියලූ චෝදනා බලය යොදා යටපත් කිරීමට ඔහුට සිදුවනු ඇති අතර ඒ මගින් කිසියම් විශාල ප‍්‍රමාණයකට බිඳ වැටී තිබෙන නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍යය පරිපූර්ණ බිඳ වැටීමක් බවට පත්කිරීමට හේතුවනු ඇත.


මහින්දගේ සිවිල් මනස


මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ හා ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ එකම පවුලේ සාමාජිකයන් දෙදෙනකු වුවද බරපතළ සීමාසහිතකම් තිබියදීත් මහින්දට තිබුණේ සිවිල් මනසක් මිස මිලිටරි මනසක් නොවේ. 


ගෝඨාභයට තිබෙන්නේ සිවිල් මනසක් නොව මිලිටරි මනසකි.

පෝද්දල ජයන්ත පැහැර ගැනීමේ සිද්ධියේදී එය අසා ජනාධිපතිවරයා අප ඉදිරියේ කම්පාවට පත්වූ ආකාරය ගැන මම මීට පෙර ලියා ඇත්තෙමි. ඔහුගේ ශරීර භාෂාවෙන් අප තේරුම් ගන්නේ ඒ සිද්ධිය ඔහු තුළ බරපතළ කම්පනයක් ඇති කිරීමට හේතුවී තිබුණු බවය. ඔහුගේ පාලනයෙන් තොරව රටේ දේවල් සිදුවන බව ඔහු අවස්ථා ගණනාවකදී පිළිගෙන තිබුණි. ලසන්ත වික‍්‍රමතුංගගේ ඝාතනයෙන් පසුවද ජනාධිපතිවරයා මට දුරකතනයෙන් කතා කොට ලසන්තගේ සිද්ධියට මගේ සම්බන්ධයක් තිබෙන්නේ යැයි ඔබ සිතන්නේදැයි මගෙන් ප‍්‍රශ්න කළේය. මා ඊට කිසිදු පිළිතුරක් නොදී ජනාධිපතිවරයාට කතා කරන්නට ඉඩ හැර බලා සිටියෙමි. ලසන්ත සමග ජනාධිපතිවරයාට තිබූ දීර්ඝකාලීන මිත‍්‍රත්වය මට පැහැදිලි කළේය. ඒ විස්තර මමද දැන දැන සිටියෙමි. ලසන්ත වික‍්‍රමතුංග එජාපයට එකතු වන්නට පෙර සිරිමා බණ්ඩාරනායක මැතිනියගේ ලේකම්වරයකු ලෙස ක‍්‍රියා කළේය. මහින්දට ලසන්ත සමග ඒ කාලයේ සිටම කිට්ටු මිත‍්‍රත්වයක් තිබුණි. ජනාධිපතිනි චන්ද්‍රිකා කුමාරතුංග කාලයේදී ඒ දෙදෙනා අතර තිබූ මිත‍්‍රත්වයේ ලොකු වර්ධනයක් සිදුවූ අතර චන්ද්‍රිකාගේ කැබිනට් මණ්ඩලය තුළ සිදුවන සියලූ වැදගත් දේ ලසන්ත දැනගත්තේ මහින්දගෙනි. ලසන්ත හා මහින්ද අතර තිබුණු ළඟ සම්බන්ධය ජනාධිපතිනි චන්ද්‍රිකා දැන සිටි අතර කැබිනට් රහස් ලසන්ත අතට පත්වන්නේ මහින්දගෙන් බවද ඇය දැන සිටියාය. ඇය මහින්ද හඳුන්වන ලද්දේ ‘රිපෝටර්’ යන අන්වර්ථ නාමයෙනි.
2005 මහින්ද ජනාධිපතිවීමෙන් පසු ලසන්ත ආණ්ඩුවේ කොටස්කාරයකු කරගැනීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයා උත්සාහ කළද ලසන්ත තමන් දන්නා එජාප සමග රැුඳී සිටින්නට තීරණය කළේය. අවසන් යුද්ධය පැවති කාලයේදී ලසන්ත දැඩි ආණ්ඩු විරෝධී භූමිකාවක් රඟපෑවද, ලසන්තට ජනාධිපති මහින්ද සමගද අන්තර් සම්බන්ධතා තිබුණි.


ජේවීපී දෙවැනි කැරැුල්ල කාලයේ සිටම කුසල් පෙරේරා මහින්දගේ සමීප හිතවතෙකු වූ අතර මහින්ද ක‍්‍රියාවට නගන ලද පාද යාත‍්‍රාව හා ජන ඝෝෂාව යන වැඩසටහන් කුසල්ගේ වැඩසටහන් විය. එහෙත් මහින්ද බලයට පත්වීමෙන් පසුව ඔහු මහින්දගේ ආධාරකරුවකු බවට පත් නොවූ අතර ඒ වෙනුවට මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ පාලනය විවේචනය කරන විවේචකයකු වශයෙන් ක‍්‍රියා කළේය.


කුසල් පෙරේරා


ශිවරාම් හෙවත් තරාකි පැහැරගෙන ගියේ ඔහු කුසල් සමග සාකච්ඡුා කරමින් සිටි අවස්ථාවකදීය. 

එම පැහැර ගැනීම සිදුවන්නට පැයකට පමණ පෙර මමද ඒ ස්ථානයේ ඒ දෙදෙනා සමග බීරබොමින් කතාබහක නිරතවෙමින් සිටියෙමි. මා එම ස්ථානයෙන් පිටවී ගියේ වෙනත් වැඩක් මට තිබූ නිසාය.

ජනමාධ්‍යවේදීන් පැහැරගෙන ගොස් මරා දැමීම හා පහරදීම් දිගින් දිගටම සිදුවන විට ඒ ඉරණම කුසල්ටත් හිමිවේද කියන බියක් මහින්ද තුළ ඇතිවී තිබුණු අතර ඔහු හර්ෂ නවරත්න යොදාගෙන කුසල්ව ටික කලකට නේපාලයේ රැුකියාවකට යවන ලද බව මට අසන්නට ලැබුණි. ඊට මහින්දගේ අතක් තිබූ බව කුසල් පවා දැන නොසිටියාද විය හැකිය.
අභ්‍යන්තර යුද්ධය ජයගැනීමෙන් පසු බිඳ වැටී තිබුණු සමාජ ක‍්‍රමය හා කුණුවූ තත්ත්වයකට පත්ව තිබුණු රාජ්‍යය ප‍්‍රතිනිර්මාණය කරගැනීම සඳහා ව්‍යුහාත්මක ප‍්‍රතිසංස්කරණ ඇතිකර ගන්නා තැනකට නොගියහොත් ලංකාව අරාජික තත්ත්වයකට තල්ලූවීම නොවැළැක්විය හැකිවනු ඇතිය කියන දැඩි මතයක් මා ඇති කරගෙන තිබුණි. ඒ ගැන සම්බන්දන් ඇතුළු දෙමළ සන්ධානයේ නායකයන් සමගද අප කිහිපදෙනෙක් සාකච්ඡුා දෙකක් පවත්වා තිබුණි. ව්‍යුහාත්මක ප‍්‍රතිසංස්කරණ වැඩසටහනක අවශ්‍යතාව මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපතිවරයාට පැහැදිලි කරදීමට මට අවශ්‍ය වූ අතර ඒ ගැන විටින් විට කරුණු පැහැදිලි කරන්නට දරන ලද උත්සාහයකින් පසුව විධිමත් සාකච්ඡුාවක් සඳහා ජනාධිපතිවරයා මට අවස්ථාවක් ලබා දුන්නේය. ඊට ඩලස් අලහප්පෙරුම ඇමතිවරයා හා ජනාධිපති ලේකම් ලලිත් වීරතුංගද සහභාගි විය.
මා එම සාකච්ඡුාවේදී ලංකාවේ ආයතන ක‍්‍රමය බිඳ වැටී තිබෙන ආකාරය පැහැදිලි කරමින් සිටි අවස්ථාවකදී ජනාධිපතිවරයා ඊට අතරමගදී කඩා පැන ”රටේ ආයතන ක‍්‍රමය විතරක් නොවෙයි, අරලියගහ මන්දිරයෙත් මා නොදැන කොච්චර දේවල් වෙනවාදැයි කියමින් ඒවා විස්තර කරන්නට විය. මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපතිවරයා කොතරම් බලවත් පාලකයෙකු වුවත් ඔහුගේ රාජ්‍ය බලය තුළ ආණ්ඩුව අභ්‍යන්තරයේ බලවත් කල්ලි ගණනාවක් බිහිවී ජනාධිපතිවරයා නොදැන ඔහුගේ නාමපුරුව යටතේ බොහෝ දේවල් සිදුවෙමින් පැවති බව ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ එම කතාව ආශ‍්‍රයෙන් මට තේරුම් ගත හැකිවිය.


ගෝඨාභයගේ බැරැුක්ක මනස

ගෝඨාභයට තිබුණේ සිවිල් මනසක් නොව බැරැුක්ක මනසකි. මා ගෝඨාභය සමග සම්මුඛ සාකච්ඡුා දෙකක් පවත්වා තිබේ. ඒ අවස්ථා දෙකටම රොයිටර් පුවත් සේවයේ වරුණ කරුණාතිලකද සහභාගි විය. ඒ සාකච්ඡුා දෙකම පවත්වන ලද්දේ ජනමාධ්‍යවලට වාර්තා කිරීමේ අරමුණින් නොව අපේ දැනගැනීම සඳහාය. පළමු සාකච්ඡුාව පවත්වන ලද්දේ අභ්‍යන්තර යුද්ධය ජයගැනීමෙන් පසුව ගෝඨාභය දරන අදහස් දැනගැනීම සඳහාය. ඒ සාකච්ඡුාව පවත්වන ලද්දේ ඔහුගේ නිල නිවසේය. දෙවැනි සාකච්ඡුාව පවත්වන ලද්දේ 2015 ජනාධිපතිවරයෙන් මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපතිවරයා පරාජයවීමෙන් දින තුනකට හෝ හතරකට පසුව එම පරාජය ගැන එම පාලනයේ ප‍්‍රධානතම කොටස්කරුවකු ලෙස සැලකිය හැකි හිටපු ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් ගෝඨාභයගේ අදහස් දැනගැනීම සඳහාය. සාකච්ඡුාව පවත්වන ලද්දේ ඔහුගේ පෞද්ගලික නිවසේය.


ඊට පෙර ෆෙඞ්රිකාට බැණ වැදීමේ සිද්ධිය ගැන මා ජනාධිපතිවරයා පුවත්පත් කතුවරුන් කිහිපදෙනකු ඉදිරියේ ඔහු බරපතළ ප‍්‍රශ්න කිරීමකට ලක් කර තිබුණු අතර අලූත්ගම සිදුවූ මුස්ලිම් විරෝධී පහරදීමෙන් පසුවද ගෝඨාගේ සෙවණැල්ල යන මාතෘකාවෙන් ලියන ලද ලිපියක් මගින් එම අවලස්සන සිද්ධියට ඔහුට තිබූ සම්බන්ධය බලවත් ලෙස විවේචනයට ලක් කර තිබුණි.


ගෝඨාභය අපට සම්මුඛ සාකච්ඡුාව දෙන ලද්දේ ඒ සියල්ල නොසලකාය. දෙවැනි සම්මුඛ සාකච්ඡුාවේදී ගෝඨාභය හිතට එකඟව අදහස් පළ කළ බව කිව යුතුය. මා අසන ලද ප‍්‍රශ්න අතර ප‍්‍රධානම ප‍්‍රශ්නය වූයේ ඉහ වහා ගිය ¥ෂණයට ඔබේ සහෝදරයා හා ඔහුගේ පාලනය මහජනයා විසින් පරාජය කිරීමට බලපෑ ප‍්‍රධාන හේතුව ලෙස සලකන්න පුළුවන්. ඒ ගැන ඔබ කියන්නේ කුමක්ද යන ප‍්‍රශ්නයයි. ඔහු එහිදී සිය සහෝදරයාගේ පාලනයේ ¥ෂිත ස්වරූපය ප‍්‍රතික්ෂේප කළේ නැත. ඒ වෙනුවට ඒ බව පිළිගත්තේය. මහජනයා එසේ නොකරන්නට ඒ වරද බොහෝ දුරදිග යන්නට ඉඩ තිබුණු බවද පිළිගත්තේය.  


ඔහු ඒ අවස්ථාවේ හිටියේ දරදඬු තැනක නොව වැරදි පිළිගන්නා මටසිලිටු තැනකය. මහජනයා මෙම තීරණය නොදුන්නේ නම් වැරදි බොහෝ දුර දිග යා හැකිව තිබුණු බව ඔහු කීවේය.

ගෝඨා තමන්ගේ සියලූ හරඹ කළේ ආරක්ෂක හමුදා සමගය. යුද්ධය පමණක් නොව, යුද්ධයෙන් පසු නගර සංවර්ධනය වැනි වැඩ සඳහාද යොදාගත්තේ නගර සභාවල කම්කරුවන් නොව, ආරක්ෂක හමුදාවල සාමාජිකයන්ය. කොළඹ නගර සංවර්ධනයේදී අවශ්‍ය ඉඩම් ලබාගැනීම සඳහා පැල්පත්වාසීන් එම ස්ථානවලින් ඉවත් කරන ලද්දේ ඔවුන්ට කරුණු පැහැදිලි කරදී ඔවුන් එම ව්‍යාපෘති සඳහා එකඟකරවා ගැනීමෙන් නොව, හමුදා බලය යොදා බලහත්කාරී පිළිවෙතක් අනුගමනය කිරීමෙනි. නගරය පිරිසිදුව තබා ගන්නට උත්සාහ කළේද කුණු ප‍්‍රශ්නය ගැන මහජන අවබෝධය වර්ධනය කරන වැඩසටහන් ආශ‍්‍රයෙන් නොව, මහජනයා තුළ බියක් ඇති කිරීමට හේතුවන පුවරු ප‍්‍රදර්ශනය කිරීමෙනි. 


විදුහල්පතිවරුන් හා ගුරුවරුන් හමුදාවට එකතු කර ගන්නා ක‍්‍රමයක් මගින් පාසල් ක‍්‍රමයට බැරැුක්ක ස්වභාවයක් දෙන ලද අතර විශ්වවිද්‍යාලවලට අලූතෙන් ඇතුළත් කරගන්නා ශිෂ්‍ය, ශිෂ්‍යාවන්ටද හමුදා කඳවුරුවල පුහුණුවක් ලබාදීම මගින් විශ්වවිද්‍යාලවලටද බැරැුක්ක ස්වභාවයක් ආරෝපණය කිරීමට උත්සාහ කළේය.

ගෝඨාභය විනය ලෙස සලකන ලද්දේ සිවිල් විනය නොව, හමුදා විනයයි. හමුදා විනය අණකිරීම් මත ක‍්‍රියාත්මක වන විනය ක‍්‍රමයක් වන අතර, සිවිල් විනය තමන්ගේ අයිතිවාසිකම්වලට අතිරේකව අනුන්ගේ අයිතිවාසිකම්වලට ගරු කිරීමේ පදනම මත ඇති කරන්නා ස්වයං විනයක් ලෙස සැලකිය හැකිය. ගෝඨාභය ආරක්ෂක හමුදාවන්ට අදාළ නිල තත්ත්වයක් දැරීමට සුදුසු පුද්ගලයකු වුවද, සිවිල් මනසක් ඇතිකර ගන්නා තෙක් රටේ පාලනය භාරව ක‍්‍රියාකිරීමට සුදුසු පුද්ගලයකු ලෙස සැලකිය නොහැකිය. ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මුස්ලිම් සමාජය කෙරෙහි ඇති කළ අනවශ්‍ය ප‍්‍රශ්න නොවේ නම් 2015 ජනාධිපතිවරණයෙන් වැඩි ඉඩක් තිබුණේ මහින්ද පරාජය වීමට නොව ජයගැනීමටය. 

ඒ අර්ථයෙන් 2015දී මහින්ද පරාජය කළ ප‍්‍රධාන පුද්ගලයා ලෙස සැලකිය හැක්කේ ගෝඨාභයය.

ජනාධිපතිවරණයෙන් පසු


ජනාධිපතිවරණයෙන් කවුරුන් ජයගත්තද ජයග‍්‍රාහකයා ලබන එම ජයග‍්‍රහණය රටේ අර්බුදයට විසඳුමක් වන්නේ නැත. රට තිබෙන්නේ වර්ග, කුල, ආගම් භේද මත භේදබින්න වී තිබෙන සමාජය ඒකාග‍්‍ර කොට ජාතිය ගොඩනගා ගැනීමට හේතුවන ලෙසත්, ¥ෂණයෙන් හා අකාර්යක්ෂමතාවයෙන් කුණුවී තිබෙන, රාජ්‍ය ¥ෂණයෙන් තොර කාර්යක්ෂම නූතන රාජ්‍යයක් ලෙස ප‍්‍රතිනිර්මාණය කරගැනීමට හේතුවන ලෙස ව්‍යුහමය ප‍්‍රතිසංස්කරණ ඇතිකර ගැනීමෙන් තොරව එක අඩියක්වත් ඉදිරියට යා නොහැකි හිරවූ තත්ත්වයකය.


විටින් විට බලයට පත් පාලකයන් විසින්ද අධිකරණය විසින්ද කෙළෙසීම නිසා දැන් රටේ ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව තිබෙන්නේද ව්‍යවස්ථාවක තිබිය යුතු මනා පිළිවෙළ හා ඒකාග‍්‍රතාව අහිමි කරගත් ව්‍යවස්ථා කඩමාල්ලක තත්ත්වයකය. කවර රජයකටවත් මෙම ව්‍යවස්ථාව සමග ඉදිරියට යා නොහැකිය. නූතන ජාතිය හා නූතන රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිනිර්මාණය කරගැනීමට හේතුවන ව්‍යුහමය ප‍්‍රතිසංස්කරණවලින් තොර ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනයක්ද ඵලරහිතය. පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ලොකු බලයක් ලැබී ඇතත්, පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තිබෙන්නේ ¥ෂණයෙන් කුණුවූ තත්ත්වයකය. එවැනි පාර්ලිමේන්තුවකට ක‍්‍රමයේ ගැඹුරු වෙනසක් ඇති කිරීමට හේතුවන හොඳ ව්‍යවස්ථාවක් සම්පාදනය කිරීමේ හැකියාවක් තිබිය නොහැකිය. යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව තැනීමට උත්සාහ කළ එහෙත් අවසන් කිරීමට අසමත් වූ ව්‍යවස්ථාව ඒ සඳහා දැක්විය හැකි හොඳම නිදර්ශනය ලෙස සැලකිය හැකිය.


ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනය


පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තිබෙන්නේ මුළුමනින් අසමත් හා ¥ෂණයෙන් කුණුවූ තත්ත්වයකය. පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත‍්‍රීවරුන් නීතියට පටහැනිව රජය ව්‍යාපාර කරන ජාවාරම්කරුවන් බවට පත්ව සිටින අතර එය පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ අසමත්කම හා ¥ෂිත තත්ත්වය කෙරෙහි බලපා තිබෙන ප‍්‍රධානතම හේතුව ලෙස සැලකිය හැකිය. එහෙත් යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවේ ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදන දර්ශනයට එම ¥ෂිත හා අසමත් තත්ත්වයෙහි ගැඹුරු වෙනසක් ඇති කිරීමට අවශ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිසංස්කරණ ඇතුළත් වී තිබුණේ නැත. එසේම මැතිවරණවලදී ඡුන්දය පාවිච්චි කිරීමට තිබෙන අයිතියට අතිරේකව රාජ්‍ය පාලනයට මහජනතාවට ක‍්‍රියාකාරී ලෙස සම්බන්ධවීමට ඉඩ ලබාදෙන විධි විධාන ඊට ඇතුළත් වී තිබුණේ නැත. 

අවසන් නොකළ ව්‍යවස්ථාවට වැය කර තිබෙන වියදමද පුදුමයට හේතුවන තරම් විශාලය. එය රුපියල් මිලියන 13600ක් හෙවත් ඩොලර් මිලියන 75.13කි. දකුණු අප‍්‍රිකාවේ ක‍්‍රියාත්මක වූයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට සීමා කළ ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනයන් නොව මහජන සහභාගි ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනයකි. 
ඒ සඳහා ගිය වියදම ඩොලර් මිලියන 30ක් හෙවත් රුපියල් මිලියන 5430කි.  
උගන්ඩාවේ ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනයද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට සීමා නොකළ මහජන සහභාගි ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනයක් විය. එයට වැයවී ඇත්තේද ඩොලර් මිලියන 20ක් හෙවත් රුපියල් මිලියන 3620කි. එරිත‍්‍රියාවද මහජන සහභාගි ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනයකට ගිය රටක් වන අතර එම ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනය සඳහා කරන ලද වියදම ඩොලර් මිලියන 4.5ක් හෙවත් රුපියල් මිලියන 814.5කි. 
ලංකාව පරණ මාදිලියේ යල්පැනගිය ව්‍යවස්ථාවක් සම්පාදනය කරන්නට දරන ලද අසාර්ථක උත්සාහය සඳහා පමණක් විශ්වාස කළ නොහැකි තරමේ දැවැන්ත වියදමක් දරා තිබෙන බව පෙනේ.

ලංකාවටද සමස්ත ක‍්‍රමයේ ගැඹුරු වෙනසක් ඇති කිරීමට හේතුවන එනම් ජාතිය ගොඩ නගා ගැනීමට හා රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිනිර්මාණය කරගැනීමට හේතුවන ව්‍යුහමය වෙනස්කම් ඇති කරන ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනයකට යාම අවශ්‍ය නම් ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනය පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට සීමා කළ යල්පැනගිය ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදන මාදිලියෙන් ඉවත් වී මහජන සංවිධානවල නියෝජිතයන්ට වැඩි බලයක් ලැබෙන ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදනයකට ලංකාව යායුතුය. මේ ජනාධිපතිවරණය ඒ සඳහා මහජනයා දැනුවත් කරන පක්ෂ නායකයන්ට බලපෑම් කරන වැදගත් අවස්ථාවක් බවට පත්කර ගැනීමට දැනුවත් පුරවැසියන් උත්සාහ කළ යුතුය. ක‍්‍රමයේ ගැඹුරු වෙනසක් ඇතිකර ගැනීමට තෝරා ගැනීමට ඊඩ වඩා හොඳ හෝ යථාර්ථවාදී මාර්ගයක් නැත.