Embargo on Thought
I thought in this Modern World there is only Truth Embargo.
I am proven wrong.
Even a plan crash investigations are pushed under the carpet.
The latest Model is "Thought Embargo".
I made a pertinent comment under a Google Discussion Forum.
A mundane political piece.
For no given reason Google AI sanctioned some of my comments.
This was an innocent discussion by Nirmal Ranjith.
He has no control on this Google "AI Gill Marts".
The item may have something do with God (I may have used the word myth or mirage).
The argument was not balanced but twisted to one direction not open ended, which it should have been.
So I did a simple diversion tactic which I am very good at, when a particular discussion becomes boring and in a circular mode or repetitive mode.
Try to get out of the inner circle and broaden the scope, as it were.
This is what happens when we allow AI to make decisions.
It is dangerous.
No idea or opinion is shaped in a Bell Shaped Curve.
The beauty of ideas is the inherent diversity.
Let the human brain decide the outcome not a man made machine, even if it uses Quantum Logic.
This is why I gradually moved away from the Internet forums and some bizarre discussions.
Karl Marx type of discussions are not allowed even the words Russia and China have become obnoxious.
In the West it is humanly impossible.
What happened to David Icke?
We need someone like Bertram Russell.
Or even the guy who proposed lateral thinking and Water Logic.
De Bono was his name.
I do not think he discussed AI at any length in his time.
He was humane and natural.
They are hard to come by.
