Saturday, January 16, 2016

Big Holes in the Big Bang Theory

There are two Big Holes in the Big Bang Theory.

How come something come from nothing?
 
It is akin to creation by god.
 
Unfortunately scientists a century ago had to satisfy the Church before uttering any theories fearing misgiving by the Church.

The Church was the authority and it had to ratify.

It was a pity.


Second was the inadequate explanation of the dark matter, a constant was proposed but this did no go well with the contemporaries.

Why there was so much dark mater was never adequately explained.

The possibility of "Big Crunch" as opposed "Big Bang" was excluded by default.

There is lot of dark matter amidst our galaxy.

We know the matter is consumed in the process of emitting photons and slowly but surely matter is exhausting itself.

There is transformation not annihilation.

Is it possible that the dark mater embedded in our galaxy is a byproduct of this transformation?

If the dark matter is expanding we got to seriously consider this probability.

If the dark mater is decreasing (in our galaxy) my theory has to be discarded outright.

If dark matter is stable we got to find an appropriate explanation.
How it got trapped amidst the matter of our galaxy needs some explanation.

Black holes of dying stars may be a candidate BUT black holes by themselves are a mystery to modern physics.

This is my alternative theory to counteract the “Big Bang”, the Holy One?


This is my alternative theory to counteract the “Big Bang”, the Holy One?


I have said, I am uncomfortable with the "Big Bang" and if I do not propose an alternative theory, then my scientific reasoning becomes VOID.

I want to propose a random theory not a unifying one.


It may sound bizarre but it is tangible in theory.


The space is taken into account with its virtual particles.

In this theory of “Whole of the Universe” the matter is only the small change.


It is less than 5%.

The dark matter is said to be 25%.

The rest 70% (near enough is dark energy).


My assumption is that matter which carry energy with charge always move towards a more stable state without charge.


Only way for it to make that move is to become dark matter and in that process it releases dark energy and dark particles without charge.


This in fact, makes the space expand.


The matter moving out and universe expanding are two sides of the coin.


It is the virtual reality.


In this theory the matter reduces not by constant shift but by random events.


So when the matter is reduced to a critical point, say less than 1% something intangible has to happen.


There is a mismatch.


Dark energy and dark mater cannot rule the universe.


It has to go into reverse gear, not in a “Big Bang” but in a series of steps.


So the dark energy and dark matter is consumed and new mater is formed and the worlds, galaxies and new universes are formed.


There is neither beginning nor end, cyclical phenomena are in existence.


(This theory is akin to Sansara, no beginning no end. I hope no Buddhist take this theory and start preaching Buddhism is scientific and concoct bizarre preachings).


There is only two or three dimensions to this theory but if few more dimensions are mathematically extrapolated, the possibilities are infinite.


The way to test this theory is to test whether matter can be changed to dark matter or dark forces.


This is more feasible since only charged particles are necessary to neutralize the charge not antimatter.

No annihilation is envisaged.


The converse of it is to try change dark matter to matter.


Bombarding dark mater to make matter is assumed more difficult due to its stability and its inherent expansion.


In other words contracting (compacting or concentrating space) space is insurmountable.


If that can be achieved “the time travel” actually become feasible.


This is my alternative theory to counteract the “Big Bang”.

There are two big holes in the Big Bang theory.

How come something come from nothing?

It is akin to creation by god.

Unfortunately scientists a century ago had to satisfy the Church before uttering any theories fearing misgiving by the Church.

The Church was the authority and it had to ratify.

It was a pity.


Second was the inadequate explanation of the dark matter, a constant was proposed but this did no go well with the contemporaries.

Why there was so much dark mater was never adequately explained.

The possibility of "Big Crunch" as opposed "Big Bang" was excluded by default.

There is lot of dark matter amidst our galaxy.

We know the matter is consumed in the process of emitting photons and slowly but surely matter is exhausting itself.

There is transformation not annihilation.

Is it possible that the dark mater embedded in our galaxy is a byproduct of this transformation?

If the dark matter is expanding we got to seriously consider this probability.

If the dark mater is decreasing (in our galaxy) my theory has to be discarded outright.

If dark matter is stable we got to find an appropriate explanation.
How it got trapped amidst the matter of our galaxy needs some explanation.

Black holes of dying stars may be a candidate BUT black holes by themselves are a mystery to modern physics.